-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bicubic sampler #588
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Bicubic sampler #588
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #588 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 78.72% 79.31% +0.59%
===========================================
Files 118 118
Lines 5034 5183 +149
===========================================
+ Hits 3963 4111 +148
- Misses 1071 1072 +1 |
@Scramjet911 Can you kindly mention how do these tests work? What is the function Boost.test.Eq? I wish to learn about these tests |
Also,how do you design the test cases? |
Boost.test.eq checks for the equality of the pixel values. The tests are basically instantiating an image with some pixels and then resizing it and testing the values of the pixels of the resized image. |
@Sayan-Chaudhuri a simple google search will help you "boost tests" or "boost lightweight test" https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_75_0/libs/core/doc/html/core/lightweight_test.html |
@lpranam Thanks. |
Description
This PR adds a bicubic sampler in the gil image resizing algorithms.
It also adds another
static_for_each()
method with 5 sources for easier manipulation of the sampler.The overflow of the pixel values are checked inside the
cubic_interpolate
function. This is not optimum, but doing it after all cubic calculations is causing overflow errors in the output.I would like to know of better ways to do this..
Also I haven't written testcases for the new
static_for_each()
method.Closes #576
References
Tasklist
cubic_interpolation
function