Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BWA-meth mapping issues #90

Open
alirazzaq254 opened this issue Dec 31, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

BWA-meth mapping issues #90

alirazzaq254 opened this issue Dec 31, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@alirazzaq254
Copy link

Hi,
I am using bwa-meth to map paired-end reads and getting the following results
633899747 + 365387445 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
573478916 + 264212420 primary
60420831 + 101175025 secondary
0 + 0 supplementary
0 + 0 duplicates
0 + 0 primary duplicates
633127309 + 365293487 mapped (99.88% : 99.97%)
572706478 + 264118462 primary mapped (99.87% : 99.96%)
573478916 + 264212420 paired in sequencing
286739458 + 132106210 read1
286739458 + 132106210 read2
286779006 + 0 properly paired (50.01% : 0.00%)
572222622 + 264024504 with itself and mate mapped
483856 + 93958 singletons (0.08% : 0.04%)
78101526 + 51005926 with mate mapped to a different chr
10620402 + 6909652 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)

Could you please help me with how can avoid the quality failed reads and how I can improve the paired reads mapping rate.
I used both R1 and R2 without trimming.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant