Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New here? You should consider alternatives #72

Open
fhewitt opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

New here? You should consider alternatives #72

fhewitt opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@fhewitt
Copy link
Contributor

fhewitt commented Apr 27, 2022

CoudForm is an awesome project, I loved it some years ago, I submitted issues and has great response from owners. It simplified my life and saved me many days of painful work with CloudFormation. It does the work, very well.

But AWS have evolved since then, and other tooling have raised.

So if you're new here, and if the idea of defining your infrastructure with code you know sound greats (it is), you should consider some alternatives, mostly:

  • AWS CDK, is similar to CloudForm: it compiles to CloudFormation template, but with additional tooling and official AWS support.
  • Pulumi, uses the imperative approach too, but uses directly the AWS API to create the resources instead of using CloudFormation and support more cloud provider.
@NOtherDev
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you @fhewitt for the kind words 🙏

@aleclarson
Copy link

I'm happy with CloudForm, other than its last version was published 1 year ago. It's ~20x smaller than aws-cdk-lib. Could someone please publish a new version, or tell me how to do it myself? ❤️

@aleclarson
Copy link

aleclarson commented Jun 27, 2022

Ok so I've published @alloc/cloudform-types with updated types (plus minified JS and DTS files). 😅

Link to GitHub repo

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants