From e5018576662113e3c889ef8a7088537d84f719ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: butterunderflow Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 20:38:37 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] (wip) bisect instrument parsing I'm not sure if coverage statistic is useful when most codes are generated. --- lib/syntax/dune | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/syntax/dune b/lib/syntax/dune index e48d631..927b584 100644 --- a/lib/syntax/dune +++ b/lib/syntax/dune @@ -3,7 +3,9 @@ (libraries sexplib menhirLib common) (inline_tests) (preprocess - (pps ppx_deriving.show ppx_sexp_conv ppx_inline_test ppx_jane))) + (pps ppx_deriving.show ppx_sexp_conv ppx_inline_test ppx_jane)) + (instrumentation + (backend bisect_ppx))) (ocamllex lexer)