Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
63 lines (39 loc) · 3.2 KB

GOVERNANCE.md

File metadata and controls

63 lines (39 loc) · 3.2 KB

caMicroscope Governance Document

Updated 9 November 2023

1. Introduction

caMicroscope is an open-source project that follows a Meritocratic Governance model, inspired by the Apache Software Foundation. This document outlines the project's governance structure, decision-making processes, and community participation guidelines.

2. Project Goals and Objectives

caMicroscope aims to provide a platform for collaborative, open-source digital pathology imaging. Our primary goal is to support innovative research and improve healthcare through advanced imaging technologies.

3. Governance Structure

3.1 Steering Committee

  • The caMicroscope project is overseen by a Steering Committee.
  • The Steering Committee has the authority to add or remove members from its ranks by a majority vote.
  • The committee is responsible for major decisions related to project direction, releases, and community policies.

3.2 Contributors

  • Contributors are individuals or organizations actively involved in caMicroscope development.
  • Contributions can include code, documentation, design, or other project-related tasks.
  • Contributors are evaluated based on the merit of their contributions.

3.3 Community Members

  • Community members are users, supporters, and stakeholders interested in the caMicroscope project.
  • They can participate in discussions, forums, and community activities.
  • Active and passionate community members may become contributors over time.

4. Decision-Making Processes

  • Major decisions affecting the project are typically reached through consensus within the Steering Committee.
  • Contributors and community members are encouraged to provide input on significant decisions, but the final authority rests with the Steering Committee.
  • Project technical decisions are generally reached through open discussion and consensus among contributors and committers.

5. Lazy Consensus

  • caMicroscope follows a Lazy Consensus model for decision-making within the project.
  • Under Lazy Consensus, if no objections are raised within a reasonable timeframe (typically 72 hours), a proposal is deemed accepted.
  • Active participants are expected to monitor discussions and voice objections or concerns promptly.

6. Adding/Removing Steering Committee Members

  • Steering Committee members may propose the addition or removal of members by a majority vote.
  • Proposed candidates for the Steering Committee should have a track record of significant contributions and commitment to the project's goals.

7. Contribution Guidelines and Code of Conduct

9. Licensing

  • The caMicroscope project follows the BSD 3-Clause License unless otherwise specified.
  • Contributors must agree to license their contributions under the same license.

10. Amendments to this Document

  • Amendments to this governance document can be proposed by the Steering Committee.
  • Amendments require a majority vote within the Steering Committee for approval.