Working Model Review

[ma3u]

The Catena-X association need your input for the Working Model:

1. Committee
2. Expert Groups
3. Release Management
4. Process Structure - Detailed description need to be cleaned up
5. Test management

Work on the branch e.g. adapt-structure. Our committee can contribute directly in respected Github organization catenax-eV and the private repo cx-working-model. Use this private Repo to contribute directly with a Pull-Request with Reviewer @Grand-Thibault and @stephanbcbauer.

use Markdown Linter in Visual Studio Code (App or Online): markdownlint

[ma3u]

@Grand-Thibault and @stephanbcbauer: Can we add the label "Working Model"?

[ma3u]

Working Group vs. Expert Group

Expert Group:

• defined process (Application, dedicated persons)
• define stabdards

Working Group:

• Special topic

[ma3u]

Resposponsibility of Standards by Committee and Experts. IP Check required by the participating companies required. Review Catena-X Roadmap for standards for the next release: https://github.com/orgs/catenax-eV/projects/15/views/2

[ma3u]

** Standards

@jSchuetz88 we need some guidance:

How is the application of standardization from Eclipse Tractus-X in the picture of the page in Working Model? We need a transparent overview of responsible standards per comimittee and responsibility. Also the standard document need the information about the responsible Comitee and Expert expert group.

NSC already have an overview and we suggest to publish this markdown to the catena-x e.v. website: https://catenax-ev.github.io

[jSchuetz88]

Hi @ma3u, the overview will be published soon, but within the standardization repository and not as a part of the working model.

[ma3u]

@Grand-Thibault : Who start the process to close a commitee? for DACI matrix.

[ma3u]

@Grand-Thibault:

Additional Roles required?

• Catena-X member
• Tractus-X contributors?

[ma3u]

Committee Review tasks:

• break down mission and vision from Catena-X association
• Define measuable business goals for next 12 months (OKRs?)
• Input to technical and operative status Sync
• Take responsibility for standards
  • Overview Standard Responsibilities
  • Break down to expert groups
  • Review dependencies in Huston
• Take responsibility for products and repositories
  • break down responsibility to expert groups
• Take responsibility Tractus-X KITs
  • break down responsibility to expert groups
• Give a overview in a sounding event every 6 months
• Guide through the Release Process
  • PI Planning, Refinement tasks in of C-X expert groups and T-X developer teams
  • Review: Definition of Entry (feature template define the Acceptance Criteria)
  • Tracking of the progress
  • Review: Definition of Done (Quality Gate Issue)

[ma3u]

Update Committee page:
https://github.com/catenax-eV/cx-working-model/blob/NSCworkingsession1/docs/organizational-structure/catena-x/committee.md

[ma3u]

A Working Group should be follow the Expert Group process as light version.

[ma3u]

Catena-X Committee and Expert Group organigram missing. @Grand-Thibault, @stephanbcbauer

[Grand-Thibault]

The organigram is linked in the description of both. It wont be included in the WM as the C-X homepage should be the single source of truth.

[ma3u]

C-X office: Does a release management Expert group is planned?

[ma3u]

discussion on demotion of expert group member definition:

• Refine Promotion/Demotion Rules for EG Member #129

• Working Model Expert Group Member