You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Give a "time" to finish features and to create stability and clear the dependencies at Dark Releases.
Plan only features/dependencies features for the "Main Releases"
The problem
The development teams need to overlap every 3 months the new features and dependencies clarification.
Creating a overhead at the dev team, causing that the quality of the features is reduced.
Solution Proposal
Create a "back interaction" or a "retrospective release" at the Dark Releases, to just focus on:
Quality
Stability
Clear dependencies between expert groups/committees/architecture.
Propose Quality Gate for "Main Releases" only -> Approval from Security, Architecture, PO (Expert Group,Committee), etc..
No "central" quality group, the quality is responsibility from the Expert Groups, just the "Methods" shall be defined.
For example: how can a expert group proof the quality from their "products" with other stakeholders?
Open Topics
Quality Team for KITs, Working Groups.
Under standards
Under reference implementations
Under "product" dependencies
Show where are the quality responsibilities already documented in the working model.
How can expert groups evaluate the quality of their products, how can the committee "approve" the quality (maybe with the architecture committee)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Introduction
Give a "time" to finish features and to create stability and clear the dependencies at Dark Releases.
Plan only features/dependencies features for the "Main Releases"
The problem
The development teams need to overlap every 3 months the new features and dependencies clarification.
Creating a overhead at the dev team, causing that the quality of the features is reduced.
Solution Proposal
Create a "back interaction" or a "retrospective release" at the Dark Releases, to just focus on:
Propose Quality Gate for "Main Releases" only -> Approval from Security, Architecture, PO (Expert Group,Committee), etc..
No "central" quality group, the quality is responsibility from the Expert Groups, just the "Methods" shall be defined.
For example: how can a expert group proof the quality from their "products" with other stakeholders?
Open Topics
Quality Team for KITs, Working Groups.
Show where are the quality responsibilities already documented in the working model.
How can expert groups evaluate the quality of their products, how can the committee "approve" the quality (maybe with the architecture committee)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: