Type Error when using presetCatppuccin with UnoCSS

[Be1my]

I am trying to use the presetCatppuccin with UnoCSS, but I am encountering the following TypeScript error:

Type 'Preset<object>' is not assignable to type 'PresetOrFactory<any> | PresetOrFactory<any>[]'. Type 'Preset<object>' is not assignable to type 'Preset<any>'. Types of property 'rules' are incompatible. Type 'Rule<object>[]' is not assignable to type 'Rule<any>[]'. Type 'Rule<object>' is not assignable to type 'Rule<any>'. Type 'DynamicRule<object>' is not assignable to type 'Rule<any>'. Type '[RegExp, DynamicMatcher<object>, RuleMeta?]' is not assignable to type 'StaticRule'. Type at position 0 in source is not compatible with type at position 0 in target. Type 'RegExp' is not assignable to type 'string'.

This issue started occurring recently after I updated my project, but everything was working fine a year ago when I last used this package. Although the project runs without issues, the TypeScript error is quite annoying.

[catuhana]

It seems like UnoCSS has updated some internal things? I'll fix this ASAP. In the meantime, you can use the UnoCSS version used by this library, which should be recent enough.

[catuhana]

It seems like it was already fixed with 03d530e, as I have no issues with local source. Will release v1.1.2 soon after bumping dependencies.

[catuhana]

v1.1.3 should be available in npm and JSR soon. Please let me know if it's not fixed or there are other issues.

[Be1my]

Thank you for the update! I've tried v1.1.3, but the issue still seems to persist.

[catuhana]

Thank you for the update! I've tried v1.1.3, but the issue still seems to persist.

That seems weird, I can't reproduce it myself. Can you create a simple repository to reproduce, so I can test things?

[Be1my]

It seems to be a version issue in the package.json. The error disappeared when I updated unocss to v0.64.0.
unocss/unocss#1227 (comment)

[catuhana]

Ah, that makes sense. This issue (installed UnoCSS and library UnoCSS version not matching) would be warned about with #106 by the package managers itself.