-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add funding information for records in the CDC #560
Add funding information for records in the CDC #560
Comments
Relevant elements is specified in CMM version 3 for fields 1.1.6.1 - Funding agency reference Elements 1.1.6.1.1 is only relevant for DDI-L, 1.1.6.4 is set as Optional. 1.1.6.3 is not available in DDI-C Primary initial support should be for 1.1.6.1 & 1.1.6.2 |
Study with correct DDI-C 2.5 structure: https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/detail?lang=en&q=183b8fd6f3c7ce851de590d408b44e7ea718cf96837cebcc72d4f17f4b1c23d4 |
#560: Document the JSON model used for "funding" objects
Funding information is now parsed into the CDC model and is indexed into Elasticsearch |
In the User Group (29.05.2024) the following was decided: UI labels: Regarding the profile: name of the funder (grantNo/@Agency) to be mandatory if there is information in the grantNo field |
@KristinaS4 @MortenSikt I could use some clarifications:
I merged the current implementation already so you can see it on test instance and then I'll open another PR if needed. Reopened issue for now since it got automatically closed when I merged but it can be closed if you're happy with this. |
It looks good in the test instance so I think you can close this issue (again). |
Thank you @KristinaS4 !
We could add just the funders but I just realized that currently we don't actually have the information whether it's a person or organization and that seems to be mandatory. When searching about adding grant numbers, I found a somewhat recent (from Feb) related issue on Dataverse's issue tracker. It seems other people are also thinking on how to show grant numbers but haven't really tested yet how Google's validation tools would respond when following e.g. Science on schema.org guidelines. Maybe it's better to leave funding information out of JSON-LD for now unless we decide on some format we want to try for grant numbers or we add just funders with the assumption that they are organizations (most of them are but not all). |
FSD would like the funder to be parsed even if a grant number is not present |
Here is an example of a study with funders, but no grant numbers: https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/detail?lang=en&q=9153705deb0a6655a23d882fd8946cf8f07e32ea3a2d947fefef4be9017406db |
Same study in FSD's OAI-PMH endpoint: https://services.fsd.tuni.fi/v0/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_ddi25&identifier=oai:fsd.uta.fi:FSD3819 CDC Searchkit will also require changes after indexing has been changed. Currently UI assumes that grant number will be there if any funding information is available. |
Information on the funders of the study is relevant for expore and attribution of the institutions paying for the collection of the research data. This information should be added to the CDC.
Unsure if this is possible without addition to the profiles, since the relevant elements does not exist within the CDC nor the EQB profiles.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: