Tidying up detailed view

[MortenSikt]

This has been brought up earlier in the UG and the problem increases with addition of new elements.

Main issue is when a record holds no information for an element “Not available” or same phrasing in metadata language of the record is shown.

1. Not all information elements might be relevant for the record (for instance series and related publications)

2. Alot of “not available” elements can put the record/SP in a “bad light”

3. Metadata people at SPs might be interested in viewing the CDC to see what information they are not providing.They might have this information in their holdings, but it is either
   - not harvested correctly, or
   - they are using a “wrong” element not compliant with profile

Suggestion of elements to always be shown (decided by UG)

• Study Title
• Creator
• Study number/PID
• Abstract
• Publisher
• Publication year
• Data access (CV)
• Terms of data access
• Topic
• Keywords
• Collection years
• Country

Suggestion of elements to be excluded (decided by UG)

• Series
• Time dimension
• Universe
• Sampling procedure
• Kind of data
• Data collection mode
• Related publications
• Funder (already hidden if no information)
• Grant number (already hidden if no information)

Clarification needed from MO/TM for the possibility of a "default" view and a "detailed" view on study landing pages to enable 3.

[MortenSikt]

Decision from User Group 27.01.25:

• Agree to have a default view and a detailed view
• Elements that can be filtered should always be shown

First post of issue has been updated to reflect decisions in UG. MO/TM has clarified that it is possible to create a "default" and "detailed" view. These changes should be included when we do a design rework of the detailed page

cc @alen-vodopijevec-cessda