You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Even though the input is invalid, the compiler ought to produce a meaningful error message, not a backtrace and internal bug:
C:\...\Documents\Céu-0.40\examples\pico-ceu\dist>..\..\..\run\lua53.exe
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua --pre --pre-input=..\bug-pool.ceu --ceu --ceu-features-pool=true
stack traceback:
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:3943: in field 'asr'
[... duplicate output elided, see below ...]
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:7542: in main chunk
[C]: in ?
..\..\..\run\lua53.exe: ..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:3944: bug (expected: ID_abs | found: ID_prim)
stack traceback:
[C]: in function 'error'
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:3944: in field 'asr'
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:6910: in local 'mid'
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:4159: in upvalue 'visit_aux'
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:4153: in upvalue 'visit_aux'
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:4197: in function <..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:4194>
(...tail calls...)
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:4153: in upvalue 'visit_aux'
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:4153: in upvalue 'visit_aux'
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:4153: in upvalue 'visit_aux'
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:4153: in upvalue 'visit_aux'
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:4153: in upvalue 'visit_aux'
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:4153: in upvalue 'visit_aux'
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:4153: in function <..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:4122>
(...tail calls...)
..\..\..\run\ceu.lua:7542: in main chunk
[C]: in ?
I'm using the downloaded pre-0.40 Céu binary package on MS-Windows 7. bug-pool.ceu contains solely pool[7] uint ids;
BTW, somehow another bug is that the backtrace is shown twice, isnt'it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Even though the input is invalid, the compiler ought to produce a meaningful error message, not a backtrace and internal bug:
I'm using the downloaded pre-0.40 Céu binary package on MS-Windows 7. bug-pool.ceu contains solely
pool[7] uint ids;
BTW, somehow another bug is that the backtrace is shown twice, isnt'it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: