Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flux algorithm might miss important adsorbates #35

Open
rwest opened this issue Jul 5, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Flux algorithm might miss important adsorbates #35

rwest opened this issue Jul 5, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@rwest
Copy link
Collaborator

rwest commented Jul 5, 2018

Just found this in an old email thread. Thought I'd post it here before archiving the email, so we can deal with it later.

I have a question for you guys about a consequence of the flux constraint and exclusion of edge species. Did you guys discuss the possibility that an edge species has a low rate of formation, but a much lower rate of consumption that would lead to a slow, but important accumulation of a species on the catalyst surface? For example, if your thermodynamic estimates suggest that an edge species would have a significant coverage at the equilibrium conditions of the last iteration, then should this species continue to be included in the core? It seems possible at first thought that this could lead to entropic or just site competition effects that could be missed by the flux constraint and that could become important over the lifetime of the intended reaction – but maybe you guys discussed this and decided that it wasn’t a concern?

The short answer is: yes, it is a concern.
Because there are inherent differences between homogeneous and heterogeneous phenomena, I think that RMG-Cat will require further modifications to the core algorithm(s). Catalyst poisoning is likely to be one of them, since site-blockage doesn't really have a neat gas-phase analogue. Richard and I have tossed around various ideas, including some test for equilibrium or steady state, etc., but it needs to be implemented and tested.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant