Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about Using Effective Sample Size vs Observed Sample Size for Coloc Analysis #165

Open
laleoarrow opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@laleoarrow
Copy link

Hi all,

I am currently conducting post-GWAS analysis and am planning to use Coloc for identifying shared genetic signals for two case/control gwas studies. The gwas were result of GWAS meta-analysis, which means it has different N for each SNP. I am unsure whether I should use the effective sample size (ESS) or the observed sample size (OSS) in my analysis.

Based on my understanding, the ESS adjusts for factors such as relatedness among individuals and the structure of the data, providing a more accurate measure of the statistical power and precision of effect size estimates. Additionally, in some case for a case control dataset, the proportion of samples in dataset for each SNP are not available.

Could you please advise on whether I should use ESS or OSS for Coloc analysis and provide any relevant references or guidelines?

Thank you for your assistance!

Ao

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant