diff --git a/content/publication/wu2023replacement.md b/content/publication/wu2023replacement.md
index e0fbab2..9dd8275 100644
--- a/content/publication/wu2023replacement.md
+++ b/content/publication/wu2023replacement.md
@@ -7,11 +7,11 @@
# 5 -> 'Thesis'
title = "If not me, then who? Responsibility and replacement"
-date = "2023-03-07"
+date = "2023-10-02"
authors = ["S. A. Wu","T. Gerstenberg"]
publication_types = ["1"]
-publication_short = "_PsyArXiv_"
-publication = "Wu S. A., Gerstenberg T. (2023). If not me, then who? Responsibility and replacement. In _PsyArXiv_."
+publication_short = "_Cognition_"
+publication = "Wu S. A., Gerstenberg T. (accepted). If not me, then who? Responsibility and replacement. _Cognition_."
abstract = "How do people hold others responsible? Responsibility judgments are affected not only by what actually happened, but also by what could have happened if things had turned out differently. Here, we look at how replaceability -- the ease with which a person could have been replaced by someone else -- affects responsibility. We develop the counterfactual replacement model which runs simulations of alternative scenarios to determine the probability that the outcome would have been different if the person of interest had been replaced. The model predicts that a person is held more responsible when it would have been more difficult to replace them. To test the model's predictions, we design a paradigm that quantitatively varies replaceability by manipulating the number of replacements as well as the probability with which each replacement would have been available. Across three experiments featuring increasingly complex scenarios, we show that the model explains participants' responsibility judgments well in both social and physical settings, and better than alternative models that rely only on features of what actually happened."
image_preview = ""
selected = false
diff --git a/docs/404.html b/docs/404.html
index dc9dea6..92cb07e 100644
--- a/docs/404.html
+++ b/docs/404.html
@@ -237,6 +237,10 @@
- A challenge when figuring out what happened based on what others say is that they might disagree. Two preregistered experiments examined how children age 7 to 11 years use disagreement to make inferences about social events. Specifically, when there …
+ How do people hold others responsible? Responsibility judgments are affected not only by what actually happened, but also by what could have happened if things had turned out differently. Here, we look at how replaceability -- the ease with which a …
- The words we use to describe what happened shape the story a listener imagines. How do speakers choose what causal expression to use? How does that impact what listeners infer about what happened? In this paper, we develop a computational model of …
+ A challenge when figuring out what happened based on what others say is that they might disagree. Two preregistered experiments examined how children age 7 to 11 years use disagreement to make inferences about social events. Specifically, when there …
- As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into our everyday lives, understanding their ability to comprehend human mental states becomes critical for ensuring effective interactions. However, despite the recent attempts to assess …
+ The words we use to describe what happened shape the story a listener imagines. How do speakers choose what causal expression to use? How does that impact what listeners infer about what happened? In this paper, we develop a computational model of …
- How do people hold others responsible? Responsibility judgments are affected not only by what actually happened, but also by what could have happened if things had turned out differently. Here, we look at how replaceability -- the ease with which a …
+ As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into our everyday lives, understanding their ability to comprehend human mental states becomes critical for ensuring effective interactions. However, despite the recent attempts to assess …