From e3cddbf655dfd7cb1365f11c0a1b3c4b93fd530e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tobias Gerstenberg Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 12:43:51 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] updated prinzing paper --- content/publication/prinzing2024purpose.md | 10 +- docs/404.html | 8 +- docs/bibtex/cic_papers.bib | 12 +-- docs/index.html | 2 +- docs/index.xml | 20 ++-- docs/member/tobias_gerstenberg/index.html | 78 +++++++------- docs/publication/index.html | 102 +++++++++--------- docs/publication/index.xml | 18 ++-- .../prinzing2024purpose/index.html | 16 +-- docs/publication_types/1/index.html | 9 -- docs/publication_types/1/index.xml | 9 -- docs/publication_types/2/index.html | 20 ++-- docs/publication_types/2/index.xml | 11 +- docs/publication_types/2/page/2/index.html | 20 ++-- docs/publication_types/2/page/3/index.html | 20 ++-- docs/publication_types/2/page/4/index.html | 11 +- docs/publication_types/index.html | 8 +- docs/publication_types/index.xml | 20 ++-- docs/sitemap.xml | 40 +++---- static/bibtex/cic_papers.bib | 12 +-- 20 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 223 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/publication/prinzing2024purpose.md b/content/publication/prinzing2024purpose.md index 03f0158..ef5dec3 100644 --- a/content/publication/prinzing2024purpose.md +++ b/content/publication/prinzing2024purpose.md @@ -7,12 +7,12 @@ # 5 -> 'Thesis' title = "From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes" -date = "2024-01-01" +date = "2024-10-26" authors = ["M. Prinzing","D. Rose","S. Zhang","E. Tu","A. Concha","M. Rea","J. Schaffer","T. Gerstenberg","J. Knobe"] -publication_types = ["1"] -publication_short = "_PsyArXiv_" -publication = "Prinzing M., Rose D., Zhang S., Tu E., Concha A., Rea M., Schaffer J., Gerstenberg T., Knobe J. (2024). From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes. _PsyArXiv_." -abstract = "People attribute purposes to all kinds of things, from artifacts to body parts to human lives. This invites the question of whether the cognitive processes underlying purpose attributions are domain-general or domain-specific. In three studies (total N = 13,720 observations from N = 3,430 participants), we examined the effects of four factors on purpose attributions in six domains: artifacts, social institutions, animals, body parts, sacred objects, and human lives. Study 1 found that original design (i.e., what something was originally created for) and present practice (i.e., how people currently use it) each influence purpose attributions in all six domains, though their relative importance differs substantially across domains. Study 2 found that effectiveness (i.e., whether something is good at achieving a goal) and morality (i.e., whether the goal is good) each influences purpose attributions, and in the same way across domains. Finally, Study 3 revealed that, within domains, the impacts of original design and present practice depend on which entity plays the role of original designer versus present user, suggesting that the apparent inter-domain differences in the impacts of these two factors might have been illusory. Overall, there are at least some respects in which purpose attributions are strikingly similar across what might seem to be very different domains." +publication_types = ["2"] +publication_short = "_Journal of Experimental Psychology: General_" +publication = "Prinzing M., Rose D., Zhang S., Tu E., Concha A., Rea M., Schaffer J., Gerstenberg T., Knobe J. (2024). From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes. _Journal of Experimental Psychology: General_." +abstract = "People attribute purposes in both mundane and profound ways—such as when thinking about the purpose of a knife and the purpose of a life. In three studies (total N = 13,720 observations from N = 3,430 participants), we tested whether these seemingly very different forms of purpose attributions might actually involve the same cognitive processes. We examined the impacts of four factors on purpose attributions in six domains (artifacts, social institutions, animals, body parts, sacred objects, and human lives). Study 1 manipulated what items in each domain were originally created for (original design) and how people currently use them (present practice). Study 2 manipulated whether items are good at achieving a goal (effectiveness) and whether the goal itself is good (morality). We found effects of each factor in every domain. However, whereas morality and effectiveness had remarkably similar effects across domains, the effects of original design and present practice differed substantially. Finally, Study 3 revealed that, within domains, the effects of original design and present practice depend on which entities design and use items. These results reveal striking similarities in purpose attributions across domains and suggest that certain entities are treated as authorities over the purposes of particular items." image_preview = "" selected = false projects = [] diff --git a/docs/404.html b/docs/404.html index 99c948c..76ef725 100644 --- a/docs/404.html +++ b/docs/404.html @@ -237,6 +237,10 @@

Page not found

Publications

+ + @@ -253,10 +257,6 @@

Publications

  • Human-like Affective Cognition in Foundation Models
    • - - diff --git a/docs/bibtex/cic_papers.bib b/docs/bibtex/cic_papers.bib index 7023118..a8c30af 100644 --- a/docs/bibtex/cic_papers.bib +++ b/docs/bibtex/cic_papers.bib @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ %% This BibTeX bibliography file was created using BibDesk. %% https://bibdesk.sourceforge.io/ -%% Created for Tobias Gerstenberg at 2024-10-04 08:51:52 -0700 +%% Created for Tobias Gerstenberg at 2024-10-26 12:42:26 -0700 %% Saved with string encoding Unicode (UTF-8) @@ -165,13 +165,13 @@ @article{vodrahalli2022uncalibrated year = {2022}} @article{prinzing2024purpose, - abstract = {People attribute purposes to all kinds of things, from artifacts to body parts to human lives. This invites the question of whether the cognitive processes underlying purpose attributions are domain-general or domain-specific. In three studies (total N = 13,720 observations from N = 3,430 participants), we examined the effects of four factors on purpose attributions in six domains: artifacts, social institutions, animals, body parts, sacred objects, and human lives. Study 1 found that original design (i.e., what something was originally created for) and present practice (i.e., how people currently use it) each influence purpose attributions in all six domains, though their relative importance differs substantially across domains. Study 2 found that effectiveness (i.e., whether something is good at achieving a goal) and morality (i.e., whether the goal is good) each influences purpose attributions, and in the same way across domains. Finally, Study 3 revealed that, within domains, the impacts of original design and present practice depend on which entity plays the role of original designer versus present user, suggesting that the apparent inter-domain differences in the impacts of these two factors might have been illusory. Overall, there are at least some respects in which purpose attributions are strikingly similar across what might seem to be very different domains.}, + abstract = {People attribute purposes in both mundane and profound ways---such as when thinking about the purpose of a knife and the purpose of a life. In three studies (total N = 13,720 observations from N = 3,430 participants), we tested whether these seemingly very different forms of purpose attributions might actually involve the same cognitive processes. We examined the impacts of four factors on purpose attributions in six domains (artifacts, social institutions, animals, body parts, sacred objects, and human lives). Study 1 manipulated what items in each domain were originally created for (original design) and how people currently use them (present practice). Study 2 manipulated whether items are good at achieving a goal (effectiveness) and whether the goal itself is good (morality). We found effects of each factor in every domain. However, whereas morality and effectiveness had remarkably similar effects across domains, the effects of original design and present practice differed substantially. Finally, Study 3 revealed that, within domains, the effects of original design and present practice depend on which entities design and use items. These results reveal striking similarities in purpose attributions across domains and suggest that certain entities are treated as authorities over the purposes of particular items.}, author = {Michael Prinzing and David Rose and Siying Zhang and Eric Tu and Abigail Concha and Michael Rea and Jonathan Schaffer and Tobias Gerstenberg and Joshua Knobe}, date-added = {2024-01-25 13:55:21 -0800}, - date-modified = {2024-01-25 13:55:37 -0800}, - journal = {PsyArXiv}, - title = {From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes}, - url = {https://osf.io/7enkr}, + date-modified = {2024-10-26 12:42:22 -0700}, + journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: General}, + note = {https://osf.io/7enkr}, + title = {{From artifacts to human lives: Investigating the domain-generality of judgments about purposes}}, year = {2024}, bdsk-url-1 = {https://osf.io/7enkr}} diff --git a/docs/index.html b/docs/index.html index bf192ea..ae1c58a 100644 --- a/docs/index.html +++ b/docs/index.html @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ - + diff --git a/docs/index.xml b/docs/index.xml index 8295544..268e61b 100644 --- a/docs/index.xml +++ b/docs/index.xml @@ -6,9 +6,18 @@ Hugo -- gohugo.io en-us © 2024 Tobias Gerstenberg - Tue, 08 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000 + Sat, 26 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000 + + From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes + https://cicl.stanford.edu/publication/prinzing2024purpose/ + Sat, 26 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000 + + https://cicl.stanford.edu/publication/prinzing2024purpose/ + + + Self-supervised alignment with mutual information: Learning to follow principles without preference labels https://cicl.stanford.edu/publication/franken2024sami/ @@ -135,14 +144,5 @@ - - Procedural dilemma generation for evaluating moral reasoning in humans and language models - https://cicl.stanford.edu/publication/franken2024rails/ - Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0000 - - https://cicl.stanford.edu/publication/franken2024rails/ - - - diff --git a/docs/member/tobias_gerstenberg/index.html b/docs/member/tobias_gerstenberg/index.html index c32cb0a..8a1f7a4 100644 --- a/docs/member/tobias_gerstenberg/index.html +++ b/docs/member/tobias_gerstenberg/index.html @@ -356,6 +356,45 @@

    Publications

    + + + (2024). + + From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes. + Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. + + + + +

    + + + + + + Preprint + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

    + +
    +
    @@ -1112,45 +1151,6 @@

    Publications

    -

    - -
    -
    - - - (2024). - - From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes. - PsyArXiv. - - - - -

    - - - - - - Preprint - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    diff --git a/docs/publication/index.html b/docs/publication/index.html index 202a727..534511d 100644 --- a/docs/publication/index.html +++ b/docs/publication/index.html @@ -1746,6 +1746,57 @@

    Publications

    +
    + +
    + + + (2024). + + From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes. + Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. + + + + +

    + + + + + + Preprint + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

    + +
    + + +
    + + + + + + +
    @@ -2685,57 +2736,6 @@

    Publications

    -

    - -
    - - -
    - - - - - - - -
    - -
    - - - (2024). - - From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes. - PsyArXiv. - - - - -

    - - - - - - Preprint - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    diff --git a/docs/publication/index.xml b/docs/publication/index.xml index b56f6ca..781e6ab 100644 --- a/docs/publication/index.xml +++ b/docs/publication/index.xml @@ -12,6 +12,15 @@ + + From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes + https://cicl.stanford.edu/publication/prinzing2024purpose/ + Sat, 26 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000 + + https://cicl.stanford.edu/publication/prinzing2024purpose/ + + + Self-supervised alignment with mutual information: Learning to follow principles without preference labels https://cicl.stanford.edu/publication/franken2024sami/ @@ -156,15 +165,6 @@ - - From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes - https://cicl.stanford.edu/publication/prinzing2024purpose/ - Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000 - - https://cicl.stanford.edu/publication/prinzing2024purpose/ - - - Anticipating the risks and benefits of counterfactual world simulation models https://cicl.stanford.edu/publication/kirfel2023anticipating/ diff --git a/docs/publication/prinzing2024purpose/index.html b/docs/publication/prinzing2024purpose/index.html index f8e71c0..3e0e723 100644 --- a/docs/publication/prinzing2024purpose/index.html +++ b/docs/publication/prinzing2024purpose/index.html @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ - + @@ -108,12 +108,12 @@ - + - + - + @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@

    From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investiga

    Abstract

    -

    People attribute purposes to all kinds of things, from artifacts to body parts to human lives. This invites the question of whether the cognitive processes underlying purpose attributions are domain-general or domain-specific. In three studies (total N = 13,720 observations from N = 3,430 participants), we examined the effects of four factors on purpose attributions in six domains: artifacts, social institutions, animals, body parts, sacred objects, and human lives. Study 1 found that original design (i.e., what something was originally created for) and present practice (i.e., how people currently use it) each influence purpose attributions in all six domains, though their relative importance differs substantially across domains. Study 2 found that effectiveness (i.e., whether something is good at achieving a goal) and morality (i.e., whether the goal is good) each influences purpose attributions, and in the same way across domains. Finally, Study 3 revealed that, within domains, the impacts of original design and present practice depend on which entity plays the role of original designer versus present user, suggesting that the apparent inter-domain differences in the impacts of these two factors might have been illusory. Overall, there are at least some respects in which purpose attributions are strikingly similar across what might seem to be very different domains.

    +

    People attribute purposes in both mundane and profound ways—such as when thinking about the purpose of a knife and the purpose of a life. In three studies (total N = 13,720 observations from N = 3,430 participants), we tested whether these seemingly very different forms of purpose attributions might actually involve the same cognitive processes. We examined the impacts of four factors on purpose attributions in six domains (artifacts, social institutions, animals, body parts, sacred objects, and human lives). Study 1 manipulated what items in each domain were originally created for (original design) and how people currently use them (present practice). Study 2 manipulated whether items are good at achieving a goal (effectiveness) and whether the goal itself is good (morality). We found effects of each factor in every domain. However, whereas morality and effectiveness had remarkably similar effects across domains, the effects of original design and present practice differed substantially. Finally, Study 3 revealed that, within domains, the effects of original design and present practice depend on which entities design and use items. These results reveal striking similarities in purpose attributions across domains and suggest that certain entities are treated as authorities over the purposes of particular items.

    @@ -266,8 +266,8 @@

    Abstract

    Type
    - - Preprint + + Journal
    @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@

    Abstract

    Publication
    -
    Prinzing M., Rose D., Zhang S., Tu E., Concha A., Rea M., Schaffer J., Gerstenberg T., Knobe J. (2024). From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes. PsyArXiv.
    +
    Prinzing M., Rose D., Zhang S., Tu E., Concha A., Rea M., Schaffer J., Gerstenberg T., Knobe J. (2024). From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
    diff --git a/docs/publication_types/1/index.html b/docs/publication_types/1/index.html index 5f75d64..844d5ff 100644 --- a/docs/publication_types/1/index.html +++ b/docs/publication_types/1/index.html @@ -274,15 +274,6 @@

    STaR-G

    -
    -

    From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes

    -
    - - People attribute purposes to all kinds of things, from artifacts to body parts to human lives. This invites the question of whether the cognitive processes underlying purpose attributions are domain-general or domain-specific. In three studies (total … - -
    -
    -

    Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models

    diff --git a/docs/publication_types/1/index.xml b/docs/publication_types/1/index.xml index 5475ab9..d3bb7a4 100644 --- a/docs/publication_types/1/index.xml +++ b/docs/publication_types/1/index.xml @@ -48,15 +48,6 @@ - - From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes - https://cicl.stanford.edu/publication/prinzing2024purpose/ - Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000 - - https://cicl.stanford.edu/publication/prinzing2024purpose/ - - - Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models https://cicl.stanford.edu/publication/srivastava2022imitation/ diff --git a/docs/publication_types/2/index.html b/docs/publication_types/2/index.html index a769d8e..069187b 100644 --- a/docs/publication_types/2/index.html +++ b/docs/publication_types/2/index.html @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ - + @@ -238,6 +238,15 @@

    2

    +
    +

    From Artifacts to Human Lives: Investigating the Domain-Generality of Judgments about Purposes

    +
    + + People attribute purposes in both mundane and profound ways—such as when thinking about the purpose of a knife and the purpose of a life. In three studies (total N = 13,720 observations from N = 3,430 participants), we tested whether these seemingly … + +
    +
    + -
    -

    A counterfactual simulation model of causation by omission

    -
    - - When do people say that an event that didn't happen was a cause? We extend the counterfactual simulation model (CSM) of causal judgment (Gerstenberg, Goodman, Lagnado, & Tenenbaum, 2021) and test it in a series of three experiments that look at … - -
    -
    -