Mapping of ISO roles to EML fields

[timvdstap]

I think it'll be useful to reach consensus on which roles from the Metadata Entry Form are mapped to which basic metadata fields (Resource Contact, Resource Creator, Metadata Providers) in the IPT. Note that the Resource Contact and Creator are required fields, Metadata Providers is not (though I would argue very useful and highly recommended). A contact can be both a resource creator, contact and metadata provider in the IPT.

For reference, roles in the Metadata Form: Metadata Custodian, Data Owner, Distributor, Author, Coauthor, Collaborator, Contributor, Editor, Funder, Mediator, Originator, Point Of Contact, Principal Investigator, Processor, Publisher, Resource Provider, Rights Holder, Sponsor, and Stakeholder

Suggested mapping:
Resource Contact: Data Owner, Author, Coauthor, Collaborator, Contributor, Editor, Point Of Contact, Principal Investigator, Resource Provider
Resource Creator: Author, Coauthor, Contributor, Editor, Principal Investigator, Processor, Originator
Metadata Providers: Metadata Custodian, Point Of Contact

[timvdstap]

https://rdamsc.bath.ac.uk/msc/c13

[timvdstap]

Updated suggested mapping which we'll discuss in upcoming CIOOS Bio Data TT meeting on Dec 18.

[timvdstap]

Suggested mapping now included in Table 2 (Appendix A). If possible, please have a look and provide comments/feedback before our next CIOOS Bio TT meeting @jdpye

• Tim TODO: Review EDI document for recommendations on role mapping.