You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note: the current remarks: geofeed entries should be removed per RFC 9632 (Any particular inetnum: object SHOULD have, at most, one geofeed reference, whether a remarks: or a proper geofeed: attribute when it is implemented.).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This list is only referenced on 2 inet entries (it may also be submitted privately e.g. in the Google peering portal):
Note: RFC 9632 prefers using the
geofeed
attribute (as supported by RIPE), rather thanremarks: geofeed
.I propose the existing
inetnum
&inet6num
entries are updated with thegeofeed
attribute:Note: the current
remarks: geofeed
entries should be removed per RFC 9632 (Any particular inetnum: object SHOULD have, at most, one geofeed reference, whether a remarks: or a proper geofeed: attribute when it is implemented.
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: