Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IRR object attributes #5

Open
DamianZaremba opened this issue Nov 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

IRR object attributes #5

DamianZaremba opened this issue Nov 29, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@DamianZaremba
Copy link

This list is only referenced on 2 inet entries (it may also be submitted privately e.g. in the Google peering portal):

inetnum:        45.157.0.0 - 45.157.3.255
remarks:        Geofeed: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/civo/geofeed/master/civo-geofeed.csv

inetnum:        74.220.16.0 - 74.220.23.255
remarks:        Geofeed: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/civo/geofeed/master/civo-geofeed.csv

Note: RFC 9632 prefers using the geofeed attribute (as supported by RIPE), rather than remarks: geofeed.

I propose the existing inetnum & inet6num entries are updated with the geofeed attribute:

inet6num: 2a10:c880::/29
inetnum: 185.136.232.0 - 185.136.235.255
inetnum: 185.243.80.0 - 185.243.83.255
inetnum: 212.2.240.0 - 212.2.247.255
inetnum: 212.2.248.0 - 212.2.255.255
inetnum: 45.157.0.0 - 45.157.0.255
inetnum: 45.157.0.0 - 45.157.3.255
inetnum: 45.157.1.0 - 45.157.1.255
inetnum: 45.157.2.0 - 45.157.2.255
inetnum: 74.220.16.0 - 74.220.23.255
inetnum: 74.220.24.0 - 74.220.31.255
inetnum: 91.211.152.0 - 91.211.155.255

Note: the current remarks: geofeed entries should be removed per RFC 9632 (Any particular inetnum: object SHOULD have, at most, one geofeed reference, whether a remarks: or a proper geofeed: attribute when it is implemented.).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant