You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for creating this fork/PR – it has already solved a few issues I've had with nested serializers.
Is it possible to use these mixins to support deeply nested serializers? If I've got models/serializers in a parent -> child -> grandchild configuration, can I PATCH a parent object with data containing both new and updated child and grandchild objects? If not, is there a known/recommended way of manually creating serializers that support this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
partial doesn't behave cleanly in deeply nested serializers as discussed here. I'm not even sure cascading partial is the right way to do it.
For example, you may be willing to make a partial update to UserProfile but it doesn't really make sense to just update the street_number in a nested Address object. You really want the UserProfileSerializer to be partial and the AddressSerializer to be normal. I believe the base implementation supports this.
If you want to support a more complex stack, I would try creating a different serializer hierarchy. For example,
PartialUserSerializer():
address = AddressSerializer()
father = PartialParentSerializer()
mother = PartialParentSerializer()
Thank you for creating this fork/PR – it has already solved a few issues I've had with nested serializers.
Is it possible to use these mixins to support deeply nested serializers? If I've got models/serializers in a parent -> child -> grandchild configuration, can I
PATCH
a parent object with data containing both new and updated child and grandchild objects? If not, is there a known/recommended way of manually creating serializers that support this?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: