Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

replace rsh with an attribute proc macro #66

Open
dvc94ch opened this issue Jan 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

replace rsh with an attribute proc macro #66

dvc94ch opened this issue Jan 14, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@dvc94ch
Copy link
Contributor

dvc94ch commented Jan 14, 2022

rsh has it's limitations as we don't know the concrete type. this means we can't currently handle something like Future<Iterator<String>> unless we constrain the Iterator to be a Vec. should also help with #45 in providing less cryptic error messages

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant