Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussing the cloud native principle of packaging #33

Open
taylor opened this issue Feb 14, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Discussing the cloud native principle of packaging #33

taylor opened this issue Feb 14, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@taylor
Copy link
Collaborator

taylor commented Feb 14, 2020

https://github.com/cncf/telecom-user-group/pull/29/files#r379225449

@jeffsaelens

is it a container? or an executable and self-contained runtime? Containers are just one form of packaging. How will we field questions from execs asking how serverless or super lightweight VMs adhering to the principles eventually fits into this vision? This paragraph in general draws the conclusion that cloud native = containers which is a slippery slope. There are a lot of containers deployed today that don't provide the benefits laid out in the last sentence of this paragraph.

@dabernie

agreed, we are already seeing instances of unikernels as a form of packaging supported on k8s with sometimes better performance then even containers compared to VMs. (ref: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-natarajan-nfvrg-containers-for-nfv-03)

@taylor taylor changed the title [Whitepaper] Discussing the cloud native principle of packaging Discussing the cloud native principle of packaging Feb 25, 2020
@jeffsaelens
Copy link
Collaborator

@taylor Do you want me to work on this before the final draft is cut, or wait until after the first one is cut?

@taylor
Copy link
Collaborator Author

taylor commented Feb 25, 2020

@jeffsaelens only if you think we need updates for this prologue whitepaper.

Same for @dabernie

@jeffsaelens
Copy link
Collaborator

PR submitted for review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants