Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Offboarding process #118

Open
jayvdb opened this issue Apr 18, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Offboarding process #118

jayvdb opened this issue Apr 18, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@jayvdb
Copy link
Member

jayvdb commented Apr 18, 2018

Each good developer we loose is a failure in our systems.

We need offboarding processes to try to understand how we failed.

We can also force failure by incorrectly assuming we have already lost the individual, when the cause was they had other priorities.

inactive doesnt imply disinterested, and shouldnt be reason for rejection.

And not everyone is a coder.

coala/coala#3645 is the most relevant background for forcing offboarding.

The reason was the assignee drop-down in GitHub was too slow at loading the long list of members. Removing people who have never contributed might sound like the easy solution, but it fails when we dont know when they were invited, and is very counter-productive if it is done near any time near an offline workshow being held, or done from October/November through to about March as that covers the Google Code-in & Google Summer of Code induction period.

The newcomer gamification process should give us a better set of data to work with, including 'first seen' date.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant