QA Report

[c4-bot-9]

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.

[wildmolasses]

L-01 disputed; stray transfers are not in scope
L-02 not useful; MEV searcher tweaking is out of scope; searcher can write a smart contract method claiming max allowed if this situation is considered important
L-03 dupe of #205
L-04 Not applicable or useful

NCs: nothing that we see as particularly useful (NC-02 will be addressed based on #388)

Ultimately we are glad to see this report, but don't consider it particularly high quality (nor will we dispute it)

[c4-sponsor]

wildmolasses (sponsor) acknowledged

[c4-judge]

MarioPoneder marked the issue as grade-b

[Al-Qa-qa]

Hi,

• My 6th NC issue is the same as issue 37, But it did not forward in issue Pools with low TVL will never get their fees withdrawn from the pool #37.

• In the 5th NC issue, I talked about issue 369, but from another impact side, and provided a mitigation that fixes issue Rewards accrued will be permanently locked when there are no stakers #369 and the state I mentioned in the report.

Both issues are invalid, but they got Escalations, so I wanted to comment here to consider these issues and judge them. if something changes for these two issues.

Thanks a lot.