You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
in level 0, in the field "Breakdown", references to guides are named "Link", while in other levels, they are named "link" (note upper- and lower-case "L") --> please make uniform
the structure is different:
on levels 1-3, a relationship with another RG is given by (1) naming its title, (2) its location ("link") and (3) its relationship type with the other guide
on level 0 (the top level), the title of the other RG is in the "Title" field and there named list
--> these different structures aren't necessarily problematic, but difficult to meaningfully process
--> for now (to enable the front-end design we have agreed on), I'll have to make these different structures more similar (by flattening some of the hierarchies) (NB: this doesn't change the content of the YAML files)
--> please ensure that the way an individual RG is referenced is the same across all levels
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think I resolved the "Link" issues by making all instances lower-case. I think I also resolved the title-naming issue by removing "Title: " in level 0 and just naming the title instead, ending with a colon (just like in the level 1-3 research guides). As for the relationship type, this requires some internal discussion first.
--> these different structures aren't necessarily problematic, but difficult to meaningfully process
--> for now (to enable the front-end design we have agreed on), I'll have to make these different structures more similar (by flattening some of the hierarchies) (NB: this doesn't change the content of the YAML files)
--> please ensure that the way an individual RG is referenced is the same across all levels
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: