Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

structure betwen "RelatedAides" in levels 1-3 and "Breakdown" in level 0 not similar enough #29

Open
valevo opened this issue Jun 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
invalid This doesn't seem right

Comments

@valevo
Copy link
Contributor

valevo commented Jun 19, 2024

  • in level 0, in the field "Breakdown", references to guides are named "Link", while in other levels, they are named "link" (note upper- and lower-case "L") --> please make uniform
  • the structure is different:
    • on levels 1-3, a relationship with another RG is given by (1) naming its title, (2) its location ("link") and (3) its relationship type with the other guide
    • on level 0 (the top level), the title of the other RG is in the "Title" field and there named list

--> these different structures aren't necessarily problematic, but difficult to meaningfully process
--> for now (to enable the front-end design we have agreed on), I'll have to make these different structures more similar (by flattening some of the hierarchies) (NB: this doesn't change the content of the YAML files)
--> please ensure that the way an individual RG is referenced is the same across all levels

@valevo valevo added the invalid This doesn't seem right label Jun 19, 2024
@Maarten86
Copy link
Collaborator

I think I resolved the "Link" issues by making all instances lower-case. I think I also resolved the title-naming issue by removing "Title: " in level 0 and just naming the title instead, ending with a colon (just like in the level 1-3 research guides). As for the relationship type, this requires some internal discussion first.

@Maarten86
Copy link
Collaborator

I added rel_types too now, all "see also"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
invalid This doesn't seem right
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants