Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should there be an upper bound on patchelf? #2

Open
carterbox opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #3
Open

Should there be an upper bound on patchelf? #2

carterbox opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #3

Comments

@carterbox
Copy link
Member

conda-forge/cutensor-feedstock#65 (comment)
conda-forge/cutensor-feedstock#65 (comment)
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

To me this is one more case in favor of having a common build script in this package: #1

patchelf is used during the builds of packages to configure RPATHs for the Conda layout. So adding it here would mean that logic should also live here (otherwise the relationship between where it is used and listed would be unclear)

@carterbox carterbox linked a pull request Feb 3, 2025 that will close this issue
Draft
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

BLD: Add upper bound to patchelf carterbox/cf-nvidia-tools-feedstock
2 participants
@jakirkham @carterbox