Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bonding Criteria for Colocated Drivers #60

Open
2 tasks
Tracked by #57
fleupold opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
2 tasks
Tracked by #57

Bonding Criteria for Colocated Drivers #60

fleupold opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@fleupold
Copy link
Contributor

fleupold commented Apr 26, 2024

Proposed Bonding requirements

Current

  • $500k yield bearing stable coin
  • 1.5M COW (no specific $ value)

New (fully permissionless)

  • Keep amounts
  • Add yield-bearing ETH (value at 2-3k)

New (with autopilot signatures)

  • 100k yield baring stable or ETH
  • 1M COW

Transition Plan

  • Allow selected solvers that are currently part of the CoW DAO bonding pool to run their own driver with the limited bonding requirements
  • Require solution submission via MEV Blocker with all refunds going towards increasing the bond
  • Additionally, require 25% of COW rewards need to go towards building a the full pool
  • As soon as autopilot signatures are ready (and full bonding pool size is not reached, require use of autopilot signatures)
  • Starting in Q3, solvers that want to continue using our driver should pay 25% of CoW rewards to CoW DAO

Open questions

  • Are we willing to give up MEV Blocker rewards? (~3 ETH per day, 1/3 from Otex, Barter, Copium)
  • How much CoW are we willing to spend on incentivizing running your own driver?
@fleupold fleupold changed the title Work with external solvers to identify reasonable bonding criteria and other roadblocks for running their own driver. This includes defining incentives (positive or negative) to make solvers execute on this initiative. Bonding Criteria for Colocated Drivers Apr 26, 2024
@fleupold
Copy link
Contributor Author

Summary of call with Copium:

  • Opportunity cost of locked capital (wants to start market making)
  • Wouldn't want to run our version of the driver (write their own driver from scratch)
  • ~2 weeks of work (if he gets to focus on it)
  • Could pledge 50k USD, 400k CoW
  • Wasn't aware of MEV Blocker rewards (would be willing to use those to further build up the bonding pool)

@fleupold
Copy link
Contributor Author

fleupold commented May 3, 2024

Summary of call with Barter

  • Happy to post their proposal
  • Would run the vanilla driver initially
  • Are ok with putting up the entire bond
  • Looking for some form of extra incentive but giving soft commitment

@fleupold
Copy link
Contributor Author

fleupold commented May 3, 2024

Summary of call with Rizzolver

  • Would be excited to have more control over the submission (would allow them to quote tighter)
  • Full bonding pool is too capital intensive (opportunity cost)
  • Reduced requirements sound good, they have ~400k CoW (don't necessarily want to buy due to illiquidity not able to hedge, want to stay market neutral)
  • Ressources are stretched (end of quarter is too tight, end of year possible)
  • Would take them 1-2 months
  • Not interested by extra incentives

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant