You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since x86 is much faster, many will jump to use it as pointed out in the README. However, I found a couple issues in the image that could be useful to fix in the Dockerfile or address in documentation.
These are:
Cannot adb root into the x86 emulator (aka emulator9) (frida requires root)
Internet searches show that the emulator image may need to be changed to provide root access.
Frida-server version is ARM.
Not really an "issue", but beginners may be slow to find this doesn't work with the x86 emulator. Also, there's not a mention of this in the README. Under Using frida, users could get stuck at ./frida-server
I'd be happy to open a PR for updating the documentation if you like, but it would be really cool to add x86 support throughout this image too. Let me know!
Cameron
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, you are right, there are many improvements that should be made to the x86 support. Actually, part of the docker images are now outdated... and I usually find it easier now to pop up an emulator from Android Studio, or Genymotion, than use my docker...
I'll keep this issue and work on it asap.
Hello and thanks for the work done here thus far,
Since x86 is much faster, many will jump to use it as pointed out in the
README
. However, I found a couple issues in the image that could be useful to fix in the Dockerfile or address in documentation.These are:
adb root
into the x86 emulator (akaemulator9
) (frida requires root)Using frida
, users could get stuck at./frida-server
I'd be happy to open a PR for updating the documentation if you like, but it would be really cool to add x86 support throughout this image too. Let me know!
Cameron
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: