Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increased x86 Support or Documentation #5

Open
camgaertner opened this issue Apr 20, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Increased x86 Support or Documentation #5

camgaertner opened this issue Apr 20, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@camgaertner
Copy link

Hello and thanks for the work done here thus far,

Since x86 is much faster, many will jump to use it as pointed out in the README. However, I found a couple issues in the image that could be useful to fix in the Dockerfile or address in documentation.
These are:

  • Cannot adb root into the x86 emulator (aka emulator9) (frida requires root)
    • Internet searches show that the emulator image may need to be changed to provide root access.
  • Frida-server version is ARM.
    • Not really an "issue", but beginners may be slow to find this doesn't work with the x86 emulator. Also, there's not a mention of this in the README. Under Using frida, users could get stuck at ./frida-server

I'd be happy to open a PR for updating the documentation if you like, but it would be really cool to add x86 support throughout this image too. Let me know!

Cameron

@cryptax
Copy link
Owner

cryptax commented May 12, 2020

Yes, you are right, there are many improvements that should be made to the x86 support. Actually, part of the docker images are now outdated... and I usually find it easier now to pop up an emulator from Android Studio, or Genymotion, than use my docker...
I'll keep this issue and work on it asap.

@eatcosmos
Copy link

arm apk can install on x86 emulator?

@cryptax
Copy link
Owner

cryptax commented Jun 17, 2022

yes, only on recent versions (Android 11 if I am correct).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants