Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specter v2.0.1 is now so slow that I get an error when trying to look at the settings for the wallet. #2326

Open
freddiemacd opened this issue Apr 14, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@freddiemacd
Copy link

Describe the bug
I have a long-term wallet with over 1000 change addresses. I updated from v1.13 to v2.0.1. It takes many minutes to first load the wallets when opening Specter Desktop. Much much longer than with v1.13. If I select settings after about 1 minute I get a server error that lists the exception as 'dictionary changed size during iteration'. I have had to revert to the 1.13 app image to use Specter Desktop

To Reproduce
Happens every time I try to look at settings of this heavily used wallet.

Expected behavior
It should list the settings.

Screenshots
none

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • intel NUC
  • Where is your specter running: binary
  • If you're running a binary, which OS: Ubuntu
  • Browser n/a
  • Specter Version 2.0.1
@BTCBellyButton
Copy link

BTCBellyButton commented May 13, 2023

Same here! #2316
Unusable.

@bitcoinheiro
Copy link

Same here, I was unable to do the most basic stuff with it. Unusable.

@spyhuntergenral
Copy link

Can confirm this issue, with a fresh build from source,
default configs, no wallets.
on Firefox, chrome and edge. it takes around 25 seconds to load any page.
Nothing of interest in logs.

only thing of interest is this error from the browser debug:
GET | http://INTERNAL_HOSTS_IP:35729/livereload.js?snipver=1 Returns 'NS_ERROR_NET_TIMEOUT'

the v1.x train worked perfectly so rolling back :(

@xavierfiechter
Copy link

#2460

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants