Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 17, 2024. It is now read-only.

Latest commit

 

History

History
94 lines (48 loc) · 3.28 KB

GOVERNANCE.md

File metadata and controls

94 lines (48 loc) · 3.28 KB
Raw

Governance

Roles Overview

In order of descending power:

  • Project Lead:

    Representative of the Project as a whole.

    Coordinates progress on the project as a whole. Has veto power in some cases.

See project_lead.md

  • Core Team Member:

    A trusted individual who is usually the first point of call for big decisions, and helps coordinate teams.

See core_team.md

  • Trusted Contributor:

    A trusted individual who has made multiple contributions to the project (not including financial support).

See trusted_contributor.md

  • Team Lead:

    Coordinates a specific team and/or focus on the Project. (e.g., the Web Team Lead would manage progress on the website)

    Provides general direction and substance to their respective team.

See team_lead.md

  • Team Member:

    A Contributor that has a focus on a general area of the project. (e.g., someone passionate about Rust could be a member of the Rust Team)

    Generally contributes to their specific team. (But can, of course, contribute to others)

See team_member.md

  • Contributor:

    A role granted to members of the community that in general have shown a passion to or have already Contributed to the Project, be this through Design, Code, or similar.

See contributor.md

By-Laws

Each of the documents linked above defines Responsibilities, Powers and rules regarding Appointment/Dismissal of each role.

These are considered finalized, however, amendments can be made as follows:

Amending the By-Laws

By-Laws can be amended through two possible processes:

  • An RFC can be opened, regarding the change of one or more parts of the By-Laws.

    This would constitute a Major vote.

  • Under exceptional circumstances, the Project Lead can act reasonably to remedy the situation, as well as request for the Core Team to amend the by-laws so that they cover the situation in the future.

    This constitutes part of the Project Leads power to veto certain actions.

Once the amendment is decided on and enacted, it is important to ensure that an RFC is opened, so that changes to the By-Laws over time are tracked.

Finances

Finances are managed on OpenCollective by the Open Source Collective fiscal host. Internally, however, a new expense (or the removal of a stale one) must be opened as an RFC.

This constitutes a Major vote.

Glossary

  • Major vote:

    A vote requiring at least 75%+ consensus to enact. The relevant By-Laws cover which person(s) may be able to veto a vote or break a tie.

  • Minor vote:

    A vote requiring at least 51%+ consensus to enact. The relevant By-Laws cover which person(s) may be able to veto a vote or break a tie.

  • RFC:

    Request for comment. A special kind of proposal that affects either the Project as a whole or greatly affects any subset of the project.

    Submitted as an issue template on the crystal-linux/.github repository, these can constitute either Major vote or a Minor vote, whichever is fit for the current context.

  • Veto:

    The power to unilaterally (without possible objection) deny a decision. Should not be used lightly.