[Bug-Candidate]: Fix coverage report

[0xicingdeath]

Describe the issue:

Unclear how to read the coverage report when there is no additional information from Echidna on the state of these properties.

As an example, for the following screenshot, I'm not sure how to interpret this. What happened on the USDC.borrow for it to never be hit, but the DAI borrow could occur?

On the flip side, how should I interpret the following? The fuzzer never showed me an assertion failure on this property, so my intuition is that it should be successful (therefore all statements running green)? - yet the assertWithMsg is showing up as red.

Code example to reproduce the issue:

Curvance :)

Version:

Echidna 2.2.3

Relevant log output:

No response

[ggrieco-tob]

Do you have an screenshot on how this is covered by medusa? If the coverage looks the same, then it looks like an issue with the sourcemap, otherwise, it could be a bug in echidna.

[0xicingdeath]

If I'm not mistaken, Medusa was hitting all green on the second example for setCTokenCollateralCaps_should_succeed, but was unable to hit the first example (related to repays / borrows).

Unfortunately don't have a screenshot of it though.. current version of coverage output (i.e: post-rebase) does not hit this function