You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 4, 2023. It is now read-only.
Thanks for your wonderful automatic sorting tool. But I am not sure how I can separate similar clusters, maybe just the difference in the amplitude. units.pdf
As I attached, the offline sorter figures out two separate units for channel 6 and channel 21, however, we only got one cluster for each channel, which may combine two units. We tried to change the parameters like par.min_clus, par.template_sdnum, par.max_spk, but didn't make much difference. Do you have any suggestions how we may be able to separate these?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry, I'm not used to seeing waveforms in that GUI, but it looks like the second unit in channel 6 is just detected noise with a bit of spikes from the yellow neuron. For channel 21 I'm not sure if the green cluster is a neuron o just filtered noise aligned to its peak. You could get "similar" results if you use a smaller par.stdmin on waveclus. Usually, the spikes have good amplitude or some particular shape that differentiate them from filtered and aligned noise
Hi ferchaure,
Thanks for your wonderful automatic sorting tool. But I am not sure how I can separate similar clusters, maybe just the difference in the amplitude.
units.pdf
As I attached, the offline sorter figures out two separate units for channel 6 and channel 21, however, we only got one cluster for each channel, which may combine two units. We tried to change the parameters like par.min_clus, par.template_sdnum, par.max_spk, but didn't make much difference. Do you have any suggestions how we may be able to separate these?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: