This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 18, 2021. It is now read-only.
Replies: 2 comments
-
Given CUE is order agnostic, this does seem like a bug to me. Note this behavior is the same across eval, export, and def. Can you open an issue following the guidelines here: https://github.com/cuelang/cue/wiki/Creating-test-or-performance-reproducers |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
This discussion has been migrated to cue-lang/cue#1075. For more details about CUE's migration to a new home, please see cue-lang/cue#1078. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello all, I wasn't sure if the right place for this is here, or in slack or in issues. Let me know!
I've been trying to model our multi customer configuration and whilst trying it I saw a behaviour that I didn't expect.
I'm trying to understand if it is an issue or not, but it definitely breaks composition of different files for the approach I was trying.
So to showcase this, i have two files:
feature_definitions.cue
regional_configs.cue
If I include feature definitions before regional configs then I get an error, If i do it the other way around I get the intended outcome.
Does using expressions limit splitting out the definitions across multiple files and thus in random composition?
Is this an issue or the intended outcome?
Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions