-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
implement standard inference #694
Labels
Comments
Check the query, there are probably some ways to improve or correct it
|
@SaveTheAles LGTM |
what is LGTM? |
mastercyb
assigned happylolonly and unassigned cyborgshead, maxim-uvarov, dasein108, Snedashkovsky and SaveTheAles
Aug 2, 2024
API not deployed for now |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We discussed for a while one property of the ranking mechanism which rise huge concerns into the answering capabilities of cyber: lets call it true-false problem
true-false problem
true
particle have cyberank10
, andfalse
particle have cyberank9
true
andfalse
the winning answer will always betrue
in this post i introduce an algo i will call standard inference
standard inference
cyber project without consensus around standard inference on top of cybergraph which solves true false problem seems very blurry to me
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: