-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
/
Copy pathpatch
2535 lines (2271 loc) · 85.7 KB
/
patch
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
books/bookvolbib add references
Goal: Proving Axiom Sane
\index{Wirth, Niklaus}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@book{Wirt13,
author = "Wirth, Niklaus",
title = {{Project Oberon}},
publisher = "ACM Press",
isbn = "0-201-54428-8",
year = "2013"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Wirth, Niklaus}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@misc{Wirt14,
author = "Wirth, Niklaus",
title = {{Reviving a Computer System of 25 Years Ago}},
link = "\url{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXY78gPMvl0}",
year = "2014"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Alpern, Bowen L.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@phdthesis{Alpe86,
author = "Alpern, Bowen L.",
title = {{Proving Temporal Properties of Concurrent Programs: A
Non-Temporal Approach}},
school = "Cornell University",
year = "1986",
abstract =
"This thesis develops a new method for proving properties of
concurrent programs and gives formal definitions for safety and
liveness. A property is specified by a property recognizer -- a
finite-state machine that accepts the sequences of program states
in the property it specifies. A property recognizer can be
constructed for any temporal logic formula.
To prove that a program satisfies a property specified by a
deterministic program recognizer, one must show that any history
of the program will be accepted by the recognizer. This is done by
demonstrating that proof obligations derived from the recognizer
are met. These obligations require the program prover to exhibit
certain invariant assertions and variant functions and to prove
the validty of certain predicates and Hoare triples. Thus, the
same techniques used to prove local correctness of a while loop
can be used to prove temporal properties of concurrent
programs. No temporal inference is required.
The invariant assertions required by the proof obligations
establish a correspondence between the states of the program and
those of the recogniser. Such correspondences can be denoted by
property outlines, a generalization of proof outlines.
Some non-deterministic property recognizers have no deterministic
equivalents To prove that a program satisfies a non-deterministic
property, a deterministic sub-property that the program satisfies
must be found. This is shown possible, provided the program state
space is finite.
Finally, safety properties are formalized as the closed sets of a
topological space and liveness properties as its dense sets. Every
property is shown to be the intersection of a safety property and
a liveness property. A technique for separating a property
specified by a deterministic property recognizer into its safety
and liveness aspects is also presented.",
keywords = "printed"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Hobbs, Jerry R.}
\index{Stickel, Mark}
\index{Appelt, Douglas}
\index{Martin, Paul}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@article{Hobb93,
author = "Hobbs, Jerry R. and Stickel, Mark and Appelt, Douglas
and Martin, Paul",
title = {{Interpretation as Abduction}},
journal = "Artifical Intelligence",
volume = "63",
number = "1-2",
pages = "69-142",
uear = "1993",
abstract =
"Abduction is inference to the best explanation. In the TACITUS
project at SRI we have developed an approach to abductive
inference, called ``weighted abduction'', that has resulted in a
significant simplification of how the problem of interpreting
texts is conceptualized. The interpretation of a text is the
minimal explanation of why the text would be true. More precisely,
to interpret a text, one must prove the logical form of the text
from what is already mutually known, allowing for coercions,
merging redundancies where possible, and making assumptions where
necessary. It is shown how such ``local pragmatics'' problems as
reference resolution, the interpretation of compound nominals, the
resolution of syntactic ambiguity and metonymy, and schema
recognition can be solved in this manner. Moreover, this approach
of ``interpretation as abduction' can be combined with the older
view of ``parsing as deduction' to produce an elegant and thorough
integration of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, one that spans
the range of linguistic phenomena from phonology to discourse
structure. Finally, we discuss means for making the abduction
process efficient, possibilities for extending the approach to
other pragmatics phenomena, and the semantics of the weights and
costs in the abduction scheme.",
keywords = "printed"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Stickel, Mark E.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@techreport{Stic89,
author = "Stickel, Mark E.",
title = {{A Prolog Technology Theorem Prover: A New Exposition and
Implemention in Prolog}},
type = "technical note",
institution = "SRI International",
number = "464",
year = "1989",
link = "\url{www.ai.sri.com/~stickel/pttp.html}",
abstract =
"A Prolog technology theorem prover (PTTP) is an extension of
Prolog that is complete for the full first-order predicate
calculus. It differs from Prolog in its use of unification with
the occurs check for soundness, depth-first iterative-deepening
search instead of unbounded depth-first search to make the search
strategy complete, and the model elimination reduction rule that
is added to Prolog inferences to make the inference system
complete. This paper describes a new Prolog-based implementation
of PTTP. It uses three compile-time transformations to translate
formulas into Prolog clauses that directly execute, with the
support of a few run-time predicates, the model elimination
procedure with depth-first iterative-deepening search and
unification with the occurs check. Its high performance exceeds
that of Prolog-based PTTP interpreters, and it is more concise and
readable than the earlier Lisp-based compiler, which makes it
superior for expository purposes. Examples of inputs and outputs
of the compile-time transformations provide an easy and quite
precise way to explain how PTTP works, This Prolog-based version
makes it easier to incorporate PTTP theorem-proving ideas into
Prolog programs. Some suggestions are made on extensions to Prolog
that could be used to improve PTTP's performance.",
keywords = "printed"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Nehrkorn, Klaus}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Nehr85,
author = "Nehrkorn, Klaus",
title = {{Symbolic Integration of Exponential Polynomials}},
booktitle = "European COnference on Computer Algebra",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "599-600",
year = "1985",
comment = "LNCS 204",
paper = "Nehr85.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Singer, M.F.}
\index{Davenport, J.H.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Sing85a,
author = "Singer, M.F. and Davenport, J.H.",
title = {{Elementary and Liouvillian Solutions of Linear
Differential Equations}},
booktitle = "European COnference on Computer Algebra",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "595-596",
year = "1985",
comment = "LNCS 204",
paper = "Sing85a.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Watt, Stephen M.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Watt85,
author = "Watt, Stephen M.",
title = {{A System for Parallel Computer Algebra Programs}},
booktitle = "European COnference on Computer Algebra",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "537-538",
year = "1985",
comment = "LNCS 204",
paper = "Watt85.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Robbiano, Lorenzo}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Robb85,
author = "Robbiano, Lorenzo",
title = {{Term Orderings on the Polynomial Ring}},
booktitle = "European COnference on Computer Algebra",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "513-517",
year = "1985",
comment = "LNCS 204",
paper = "Robb85.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Hohlfeld, Bernhard}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Hohl85,
author = "Hohlfeld, Bernhard",
title = {{Correctness Proofs of the Implementation of Abstract Data
Types}},
booktitle = "European COnference on Computer Algebra",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "446-447",
year = "1985",
comment = "LNCS 204",
paper = "Hohl85.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Emmanuel, Kounalis}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Emma85,
author = "Emmanuel, Kounalis",
title = {{Completeness in Data Type Specifications}},
booktitle = "European COnference on Computer Algebra",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "348-362",
year = "1985",
comment = "LNCS 204",
paper = "Emma85.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Aspetsberger, K.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Aspe85,
author = "Aspetsberger, K.",
title = {{Substitution Expressions: Extracting Solutions of non-Horn
Clause Proofs}},
booktitle = "European COnference on Computer Algebra",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "78-86",
year = "1985",
comment = "LNCS 204",
paper = "Aspe85.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
w
\index{Bini, Dario}
\index{Pan, Victor}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Bini85,
author = "Bini, Dario and Pan, Victor",
title = {{Algorithms for Polynomial Division}},
booktitle = "European COnference on Computer Algebra",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "1-3",
year = "1985",
comment = "LNCS 204",
paper = "Bini85.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Monagan, Michael}
\index{Pearce, Roman}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@article{Mona12,
author = "Monagan, Michael and Pearce, Roman",
title = {{POLY: A New Polynomial Data Structure for Maple 17}},
journal = "Communications in Computer Algebra",
publisher = "ACM",
volume = "46",
number = "4",
year = "2012",
abstract =
"We demonstrate how a new data structure for sparse distributed
polynomials in the Maple kernel significantly accelerates a large
subset of Maple library routines The POLY data structure and its
associated kernel operations (degree, coeff, subs, has, diff,
eval,...) are programmed for high scalability, allowing
polynomials to have hundreds of millions of terms, and very low
overhead, increasing parallel speedup in existing routines and
improving the performance of high live Maple library routines.",
paper = "Mona12.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Cherry, G.W.}
\index{Caviness, B.F.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Cher84
author = "Cherry, G.W. and Caviness, B.F.",
title = {{Integration in Finite Terms With Special Functions:
A Progress Report}},
booktitle = "International Symbposium on Symbolic and Algebraic
Manipulation",
pages = "351-358",
publisher = "Springer",
year = "1984",
comment = "LNCS 174",
abstract =
"Since R. Risch published an algorithm for calculating symbolic
integrals of elementary functions in 1969, there has been an
interest in extending his methods to include nonelementary
functions. We report here on the recent development of two
decision procedures for calculating integrals of transcendental
elementary functions in terms of logarithmic integrals and error
functions Both of these algorithms are based on the Singer,
Saunders, Caviness extension of Liouville's theorem on integration
in finite terms. Parts of the logarithmic integral algorithm have
been implemented in Macsyma and a brief demonstraction is given.",
paper = "Cher84.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Kaltofen, Erich}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Kalt84,
author = "Kaltofen, E.",
title = {{A Note on the Risch Differential Equation}},
booktitle = "International Symbposium on Symbolic and Algebraic
Manipulation",
pages = "359-366",
publisher = "Springer",
year = "1984",
comment = "LNCS 174",
abstract =
"This paper relates to the technique of integrating a function in
a purely transcendental regular elementary Liouville extension by
prescribing degree bounds for the transcendentals and then solving
linear systems over the constants. The problem of finding such
bounds explicitly remains yet to be solved due to the so-called
third possibilities in the estimates for the degrees given in
R. Risch's original algorithm.
We prove that in the basis case in which we have only exponentials
of rational functions, the bounds arising from the third
possibilities are again degree bounds of the inputs. This result
provides an algorithm for solving the differential equation
$y^\prime =f^\prime y= g$ in $y$ where $f$, $g$, and $y$ are
rational functions over an arbitrary constant field. This new
algorithm can be regarded as a direct generalization of the
algorithm by E. Horowitz for computing the rational part of the
integral of a rational function (i.e. $f^\prime = 0$), though its
correctness proof is quite different.",
paper = "Kalt84.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Viry, G.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Viry84,
author = "Viry, G.",
title = {{Simplification of Polynomials in n Variables}},
booktitle = "International Sympoium on Symbolic and Algebraic
Manipulation",
pages = "64-73",
publisher = "Springer",
year = "1984",
comment = "LNCS 174",
paper = "Viry84.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Wang, Paul S.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Wang84,
author = "Wang, Paul S.",
title = {{Implementation of a p-adic Package for Polynomial
Factorization and other Related Operations}},
booktitle = "International Symbposium on Symbolic and Algebraic
Manipulation",
pages = "86-99",
publisher = "Springer",
year = "1984",
comment = "LNCS 174",
abstract =
"The design and implementation of a $p-adic$ package, called
{\bf P}-pack, for polynomial factorization, gcd, squarefree
decomposition and univariate partial fraction expansion are
presented. {\bf P}-pack is written in FRANZ LISP, and can be
loaded into VAXIMA and run without modification. The physical
organization of the code modules and their logical relations are
described. Sharing of code among different modules and techniques
for improved speed are discussed.",
paper = "Wang84.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Najid-Zejli, H.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Naji84,
author = "Najid-Zejli, H.",
title = {{Computation in Radical Extensions}},
booktitle = "International Symbposium on Symbolic and Algebraic
Manipulation",
pages = "115-122",
publisher = "Springer",
year = "1984",
comment = "LNCS 174",
paper = "Naji84.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Czapor, Stephen R.}
\index{Geddes, Keith O.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Czap84,
author = "Czapor, Stephen R. and Geddes, Keith O.",
title = {{A Comparison of Algorithms for the Symbolic Computation of
Pade Approximants}},
booktitle = "International Symbposium on Symbolic and Algebraic
Manipulation",
pages = "248-259",
publisher = "Springer",
year = "1984",
comment = "LNCS 174",
abstract =
"This paper compares three algorithms for the symbolic computation
of Pad\'e approximants: an $O(n^3)$ algorithm based on the direct
solutions of the Hankel linear system exploiting only the property
of symmetry, and $O(n^2)$ algorithm based on the extended
Euclidean algorithm, and an $O(n~log^2~n)$ algorithm based on a
divide-and-conquer version of the extended Euclidean algorithm.
Implementations of these algorithms are presented and some timing
comparisons are given. It is found that the $O(n^2)$ algorithm is
often the fastest for practical sizes of problems and,
surprisingly, the $O(n^2)$ algorithm wins in the important case
where the power series being approximated has an exact rational
function representation.",
paper = "Czap84.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Lenstra, Arjen K.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Lens84,
author = "Lenstra, Arjen K.",
title = {{Polynomial Factorizaion by Root Approximation}},
booktitle = "International Symbposium on Symbolic and Algebraic
Manipulation",
pages = "272-276",
publisher = "Springer",
year = "1984",
comment = "LNCS 174",
abstract =
We show that a constructive version of the fundamental theorem of
algebra [3], combined with the basis reduction algorithm from [1],
yields a polynomial-time algorithm for factoring polynomials in
one variable with rational coefficients.",
paper = "Lens84.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Davenport, James H.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Dave84c,
author = "Davenport, James H.",
title = {{y'+fy=g}},
booktitle = "International Symbposium on Symbolic and Algebraic
Manipulation",
pages = "341-350",
publisher = "Springer",
year = "1984",
comment = "LNCS 174",
abstract =
"In this paper, we look closely at the equation of the title,
originally consider by Risch, which arises in the integration of
exponentials. We present a minor improvement of Risch's original
presentation, a generalisation of that presentation to algebraic
functions $f$ and $g$, and a new algorithm for the solution of
this equation. Full details of the last two are to appear
elsewhere.",
paper = "Dave84c.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Lazard, Daniel}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Laza79,
author = "Lazard, Daniel",
title = {{Systems of Algebraic Equations}},
booktitle = "International Symbposium on Symbolic and Algebraic
Manipulation",
pages = "88-94",
publisher = "Springer",
year = "1979",
comment = "LNCS 72",
paper = "Laza79.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Tang, Min}
\index{Li, Bingyu}
\index{Zeng, Zhenbing}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@article{Tang18,
author = "Tang, Min and Li, Bingyu and Zeng, Zhenbing",
title = {{Computing Sparse GCD of Multivariate Polynomials via
Polynomial Interpolation}},
journal = "System Science and Complexity",
volume = "31",
pages = "552-568",
year = "2018",
abstract =
"The problem of computing the greatest common divisor (GCD) of
multivariate polynomials, as one of the most important tasks of
computer algebra and symbolic computation in more general scope,
has been studied extensively since the beginning of the
interdisciplinary of mathematics with computer science. For many
real applications such as digital image restoration and
enhancement, robust control theory of nonlinear systems,
$L_1$-norm convex optimizations in compressed sensing techniques,
as well as algebraic decoding of Reed-Solomon and BCH codes, the
concept of sparse GCD plays a core role where only the greatest
common divisors with much fewer terms than the original
polynomials are of interest due to the nature of problems or data
structures. This paper presents two methods via multivariate
polynomial interpolation which are based on the variation of
Zippel's method and Ben-Or/Tiwari algorithm, respectively. To
reduce computational complexity, probabilistic techniques and
randomization are employed to deal with univariate GCD computation
and univariate polynomial interpolation. The authors demonstrate
the practical performance of our algorithms on a significant body
of examples. The implemented experiment illustrates that our
algorithms are efficient for a quite wide range of input.",
paper = "Tang18.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Miola, Alfonso}
\index{Yun, David Y.Y.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@article{Miol74,
author = "Miola, Alfonso and Yun, David Y.Y.",
title = {{Computational Aspects of Hensel-type Univariate Polynomial
Greatest Common Divisor Algorithms}},
journal = "ACM Sigplan Bulletin",
year = "1974",
abstract =
"Two Hensel-type univariate polynomial Greatest Common Divisor
(GCD) algorithms are presented and compared. The regular linear
Hensel construction is shown to be generally more efficient than
the Zassenhaus quadratic contstruction. The UNIGCD algorithm for
UNIvariate polynomial GCD computations, based on the regular
Hensel construction is then presented and compared with the
Modular algorithm based on the Chinese Remainder Algorithm. From
both an analytical and an experimental point of view, the UNIGCD
algorithm is shown to be preferable for many common univariate GCD
computations. This is true even for dense polynomials, which was
considered to be the most suitable case for the application of the
Modular algorithm.",
paper = "Miol74.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Brown, W.S.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@article{Brow71,
author = "Brown, W.S.",
title = {{On Euclid's Algorithm and the Computation of Polynomial
Greatest Common Divisors}},
journal = "J. ACM",
volume = "18",
pages = "478-504",
year = "1971",
abstract =
"This paper examines the computation of polynomial greatest common
divisors by various generalizations of Euclid's algorithm. The
phenomenon of coefficient growth is described, and the history of
successful efforts first to control it and then to eliminate it is
related.
The recently developed modular algorithm is presented in careful
detail, with special attention to the case of multivariate
polynomials.
The computing times for the classical algorithm and for the
modular algorithm are analyzed, and it is shown that the modular
algorithm is markedly superior. In fact, in the multivariate case,
the maximum computing time for the modular algorithm is strictly
dominated by the maximum computing time for the first
pseudo-division in the classical algorithm.",
paper = "Brow71.pdf",
keywords = "printed"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Collins, George E.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@article{Coll67,
author = "Collins, George E.",
title = {{Subresultants and Reduced Polynomial Remainder
Sequences}},
journal = "J. ACM",
volume = "14",
number = "1",
pages = "128-142",
year = "1967",
paper = "Coll67.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Brown, W.S.}
\index{Traub, J.F.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@article{Brow71a,
author = "Brown, W.S. and Traub, J.F.",
title = {{On Euclid's Algorithm and the Theory of Subresultants}},
journal = "J. ACM",
volume = "18",
number = "4",
pages = "505-514",
year = "1971",
abstract =
"This papers presents an elementary treatment of the theory of
subresultants, and examines the relationship of the subresultants
of a given pair of polynomials to their polynomial remainder
sequence as determined by Euclid's algorithm. Two important
versions of Euclid's algorithm are discussed. The results are
essentially the same as those of Collins, but the presentatino is
briefer, simpler, and somewhat more general.",
paper = "Brow71a.pdf",
keywords = "printed"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Moses, Joel}
\index{Zippel, Richard}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@article{Mose79a,
author = "Moses, Joel and Zippel, Richard",
title = {{An Extension of Liouville's Theorem}},
journal = "LNCS",
volume = "72",
pages = "426-430",
year = "1979",
paper = "Mose79a.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Gabriel, Richard}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@misc{Gabr91,
author = "Gabriel, Richard",
title = {{Lisp: Good News, Bad News, How to Win Big}},
year = "1991",
link = "\url{https://www.dreamsongs.com/WIB.html}"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Chatley, Robert}
\index{Donaldson, Alastair}
\index{Mycroft, Alan}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@article{Chat19,
author = "Chatley, Robert and Donaldson, Alastair and
Mycroft, Alan",
title = {{The Next 7000 Programming Languages}},
journal = "LNCS",
volume = "10000",
pages = "250-282",
year = "2019",
abstract =
"Landin's seminal paper "The next 700 programming languages"
considered programming languages prior to 1966 and speculated on
the next 700. Half-a-century on, we cast programming languages in a
Darwinian 'tree of life' and explore languages, their features
(genes) and language evolution from a viewpoint of 'survival of the
fittest'.
We investigatge this thesis by exploring how various anguages fared
in the past, and then consider the divergence between the languages
{\sl empirically used in 2017} and the langauge features one might
have expected if the languages of the 1960s had evolved optimally
to fill programming niches.
This leads us to characterise three divergences, or 'elephants in
the room', were actual current language use, or feature provision,
differs from that which evolution might suggest. We conclude by
speculating on future language evolution.",
paper = "Chat19.pdf",
keywords = "DONE"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Pierce, Benjamin C.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@misc{Pier08,
author = "Pierce, Benjamin C.",
title = {{Types Considered Harmful}},
comment = "Talk at Mathematical Foundations of Programming Languages",
year = "2008",
link = "\url{https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/papers/harmful-mfps.pdf}",
paper = "Pier08.pdf",
keywords = "DONE"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Eisenberg, Richard A.}
\index{Vytiniotis, Dimitrios}
\index{Jones, Simon Peyton}
\index{Weirich, Stephanie}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@inproceedings{Eise14,
author = "Eisenberg, Richard A. and Vytiniotis, Dimitrios and
Jones, Simon Peyton and Weirich, Stephanie",
title = {{Closed Type Families with Overlapping Equations}},
booktitle = "POPL 14",
year = "2014",
abstract =
"Open, type-level functions are a recent innovatino in Haskell
that move Haskell towards the expressiveness of dependent types,
while retaining the lok and feel of a practial programming
language. This paper shows how to increase expressiveness still
further, by adding closed type functions whose equations may
overlap, and may have non-linear patterns over an open type
universe. Although practically useful and simple to implement,
these features go {\sl beyond} conventional dependent type theory
in some respects, and have a subtle metatheory.",
paper = "Eise14.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Wand, Mitchell}
\index{Friedman, Dan}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@articlen{Wand78,
author = "Wand, Mitchell and Friedman, Dan",
title = {{Compiling Lambda-Expressions Using Continuations and
Factorizations}},
journal = "Computer Languages",
volume = "3",
pages = "241-263",
year = "1978",
abstract =
"We present a source-level transformation for recursion-removal
with several interesting characteristics:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] the algorithm is simple and provably correct
\item[(ii)] the stack utilization regime is chosen by the compiler
rather than being fixed by the run-time environment
\item[(iii)] the stack is available at the source language level
so that further optimizations are possible
\item[(iv)] the algorithm arises from ideas in category theory
\end{itemize}
In addition to its implications for compilers, the transformation
algorithm is useful as an implementation technique for advanced
LISP-based systems, and one such application is described.",
paper = "Wand78.pdf",
keywords = "printed"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Rapoport, Marianna}
\index{Kabir, Ifaz}
\index{He, Paul}
\index{Lhotak, Ondrej}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@misc{Rapo17,
author = "Rapoport, Marianna and Kabir, Ifaz and He, Paul and
Lhotak, Ondrej",
title = {{A Simple Soundness Proof for Dependent Object Types}},
year = "2017",
link = "\url{https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.03814v1.pdf}",
abstract =
"Dependent Object Types (DOT) is intended to be a core calculus
for modelling Scala. Its distinguishing feature is abstract type
members, fields in objects that hold types rather than
values. Proving soundness of DOT has been surprisingly
challenging, and existing proofs are complicated, and reason about
multiple concepts at the same time (e.g. types, values,
evaluation). To serve as a core calculus for Scala, DOT should be
easy to experiment with and extend, and therefore its soundness
proof needs to be easy to modify.
This paper presents a simple and modular proof strategy for
reasoning in DOT. The strategy separates reasoning about types
from other concerns. It is centered around a theorem that connects
the full DOT type system to a restricted variant in which the
challenges and paradoxes caused by abstract type members are
eliminated. Almost all reasoning in the proof is done in the
intuitive worlds of this restricted type system. Once we have the
necessary results about types, we observe that the other aspects
of DOT are mostly standard and can be incorporated into a
soundness proof using familiar techniques known from other
calculi.
Our paprer comes with a machine-verified version of the proof in
Coq.",
paper = "Rapo17.pdf",
keywords = "printed"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Daumas, Marc}
\index{Lester, David}
\index{Munoz, Cesar}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@misc{Daum07,
author = "Daumas, Marc and Lester, David and Munoz, Cesar",
title = {{Verified Real Number Calculations: A Library for Interval
Arithmetic}},
year = "2007",
link = "\url{https://arxiv.org/pdf/0708.3721.pdf}",
abstract =
"Real number calculations on elementary functions are remarkably
difficult to handle in mechanical proofs. In this paper, we show
how these calculations can be performed within a theorem prover or
proof assistant in a convenient and highly automated as well as
interactive way. First, we formally establish upper and lower
bounds for elementary functions. Then, based on these bounds, we
develop a rational interval arithmetic where real number
calculations take place in an algebraic setting. In order to
reduce the dependency effect of interval arithmetic, we integrate
two techniques: interval splitting and taylor series
expansions. This pragmatic approach has been developed, and
formally verified, in a theorem prover. The formal development
also includes a set of customizable strategies to automate proofs
involving explicit calculations over real numbers. Our ultimate
goal is to provide guaranteed proofs of numerical properties with
minimal human theorem-prover interaction.",
paper = "Daum07.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Appel, Andrew W.}
\index{Dockins, Robert}
\index{Hobor, Aquinas}
\index{Beringer, Lennart}
\index{Dodds, Josiah}
\index{Stewart, Gordon}
\index{Blazy, Sandrine}
\index{Leroy, Xavier}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@book{Appe14,
author = "Appel, Andrew W. and Dockins, Robert and Hobor, Aquinas
and Beringer, Lennart and Dodds, Josiah and
Stewart, Gordon and Blazy, Sandrine and Leroy, Xavier",
title = {{Program Logics for Certified Compilers}},
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
isbn = "978-1-107-04801-0",
year = "2014",
paper = "Appe14.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Leroy, Xavier}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@misc{Lero08,
author = "Leroy, Xavier",
title = {{Formal Verification of a Realistic Compiler}},
year = "2008",
link = "\url{https://xavierleroy.org/publi/compcert-CACM.pdf}",
abstract =
"This paper reports on the development and formal verification
(proof of semantic preservation) of CompCert, a compiler from
Clight (a large subset of the C programming language) to PowerPC
assembly code, using the Coq proof assistant both for programming
the compiler and for proving its correctness. Such a verificed
compiler is useful in the context of critical software and its
formal verification: the verification of the compiler guarantees
that the safety properties proved on the source code hold for the
executable compiled code as well.",
paper = "Lero08.pdf"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Bauer, Andrej}
\index{Haselwarter, Philipp G.}
\index{Lumsdaine, Peter LeFanu}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@misc{Baue20,
author = "Bauer, Andrej and Haselwarter, Philipp G. and
Lumsdaine, Peter LeFanu",
title = {{A General Definition of Dependent Type Theories}},
year = "2020",
link = "\url{https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.05539.pdf}",
abstract =
"We define a general class of dependent type theories,
encompassing Martin L\"of's intuitionistic type theories and
variants and extensions. The primary aim is pragmatic: to unify
and organise their study, allowing results and constructions to be
given in reasonable generality, rather than just for specific
theories. Compared with other approaches, our definition stays
closer to the direct or naive reading of syntax, yielding the
traditional presentation of specific theories as closely as
possible.
Specifically, we give three main definitions: {\sl raw type
theories}, a minimal setup for discussing dependently typed
derivability; {\sl acceptable type theories}, including extra
conditions ensuring well-behavedness; and {\sl well-presented type
theories}, generalisig how in traditional presentations, the
well-behavedness of a type theory is established step by step as
the type theory is built up. Following these, we show that various
fundamental fitness-for-purpose metatheorems hold in this
generality.
Much of the present work has been formalised in the proof
assistant Coq.",
paper = "Baue20.pdf",
keywords = "printed"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Longley, John}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@article{Long99,
author = "Longley, John",
title = {{Matching Typed and Untyped Realizability}},
journal = "Theoretical Computer Science",
volume = "23",
number = "1",
year = "1999",
abstract =
"Realizability interpretations of logics are given by saying what
it means for computational objects of some kind to {\sl realize}
logical formulae. The computational object in question might be
drawn from an untyped universe of computation, such as a partial
combinatory algebra, or they might be typed objects such as terms
of a PCF-style programming languag. In some instances, one can
show that a particular untyped realizability interpretation
matches a particular typed one, in the sense that they give the
same set of realizable formulae. In this case, we haev a very good
fit indeed between the typed language and the untyped
realizability model -- we refer to this condition as
{\sl (constructive) logical full abstraction}.
We give some examples of this situation for a variety of
extensions of PCF. Of particular interest are some models that are
logically fully abstract for typed languages including
{\sl non-functional} features. Our results establish connections
between what is computable in various programming languages and
what is true inside various realizable toposes. We consider some
examples of logical formulae to illustrate these ideas, in
particular their application to exact real-number compatibility.",
paper = "Long99.pdf",
keywords = "printed"
}
\end{chunk}
\index{Bowman, William J.}
\begin{chunk}{axiom.bib}
@misc{Bowm20,
author = "Bowman, William J.",
title = {{Cur: Designing a Less Devious Proof Assistant}},
year = "2020",
link = "\url{https://vimeo.com/432569820}",
abstract =
"Dijkstra said that our tools can have a profound and devious
influence on our thinking. I find this especially true of modern
proof assistants, with ``devious'' out-weighing ``profound''. Cur
is an experiment in design that aims to be less devious. The
design emphasizes language extension, syntax manipulation, and
DSL construction and integration. This enables the user to be in