three-point-oh-point-oh #2230
Replies: 5 comments 5 replies
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
-
what about a new function |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
-
i'm thinking i might go ahead and start the 3.0.0 branch. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There's another inconsistency that has always bothered me. The Ideally the same function name should do the same operation in both contexts. A possible solution could be adding |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I want to get 3.0.0 out before the end of the year, and with my dayjob's recent gentle insistence that I do more paying work, dev time is at a premium. The importance of the "3.0.0" moniker is the SONAME/ABI version bump; I frankly wouldn't mind releasing 3.0.0 today with all of #1777 resolved.
The one thing I want is for ABI3 to be truly stable, which requires having thought through (if not necessarily implemented all the way) all desirable expansions. The last things I see maybe requiring API changes are #2184, #1682, and #1444:
i think we've made the necessary changes for the last, and the first never really needed changes. the second will probably require an expansion of
struct ncvisual_options
.is there anything else people think needs resolution for ABI3? any big dreams, perhaps not even yet recorded as bugs, which you'd like to see down the road?
i turn 41 on tuesday, and that was the original target date for 3.0.0. it's not gonna happen, but i definitely want it out in 2021.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions