-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 529
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updating hello-kubernetes
quickstart to support Endpoint env vars
#1030
Conversation
Signed-off-by: salaboy <[email protected]>
Team, I am not entirely sure how to run the javascript validation locally.. any hints? |
@paulyuk can you help me out here? I wonder if you can advise me on these changes. I can see the Javascript one failing, but it is not clear to me why. |
@salaboy definitely do not worry about Javascript* which has nothing to do with this change. I am separately investigating that. I just kicked off some fresh workflow/action runs in master to see what is going on. Tutorials is the most fragile part of quickstarts - complex and sometimes legacy. |
I see what looks like a timing issue in Hello-Kubernetes where the nodeapp is not started for about 34 loops (seconds) and then starts responding. It looks like some timing issue before the deployment is ready. I have not figured out why yet, just sharing what I'm seeing. Here is exactly where it fails |
Now I'm running on my local machine simply using Kind + |
I just went all the way back to Dapr 1.11 repo and runtime. The issue repro happens all the way back til then. I believe this is a simple timing issue exposed by dapr.yaml (multi app run). because both services (nodeapp server and pythonapp client) start super fast, and expect to communicate. But in reality nodeapp is not ready for ~31 seconds, and without a readiness check it will fail fast over and over, and the test will break. I'd love to have a readiness check that can be leveraged by dapr.yaml and the app. If not we'll have to think of workarounds, which would refactor dapr.yaml or revert back to individual dapr run commands that build in a human wait for readiness. |
@salaboy - The code changes look good. Are you also going to update the text in the readme to have a section on using Dapr Shared with these applications? |
That text will be in the Dapr Shared repo that has that tutorial. We
shouldn’t complicate any further the Kubernetes example here.
- Blog: http://salaboy.com <http://salaboy.wordpress.com>
- Github user: http://github.com/salaboy
- Twitter: http://twitter.com/salaboy
- Mauricio "Salaboy" Salatino -
…On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 at 21:40, Mark Fussell ***@***.***> wrote:
@salaboy <https://github.com/salaboy> - The code changes look good. Are
you also going to update the text in the readme to have a section on using
Dapr Shared with these applications?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1030 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACCMXWW4MW5JVJXRWXZQC3ZJHISBAVCNFSM6AAAAABI4XOBPKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCOBZHEZDONJQGA>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
) Signed-off-by: salaboy <[email protected]>
@holopin-bot @salaboy Thanks! |
Congratulations @salaboy, the maintainer of this repository has issued you a badge! Here it is: https://holopin.io/claim/clzvblcdj30100cl4xs6dend5 This badge can only be claimed by you, so make sure that your GitHub account is linked to your Holopin account. You can manage those preferences here: https://holopin.io/account. |
Description
I've updated the examples to use the DAPR_HTTP_ENDPOINT and DAPR_GRPC_ENDPOINT environment variables that are used by the SDKs. If DAPR_HTTP_PORT needs to be also supported I will need some help to validate the code.
I am not sure how images are created for these applications, help is appreciated to validate these changes.
Issue reference
We strive to have all PRs being opened based on an issue, where the problem or feature have been discussed prior to implementation.
Please reference the issue this PR will close: #1029
Checklist
Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of the following list: