You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"... the documentation of the different kinds of patterns uses the refutable syntax for some of them, and the irrefutable syntax for others. I wonder whether it would be better to just bite the bullet and document both syntaxes for each pattern type? It would also help drive home the fact that there are two syntaxes. Example here: https://dart.dev/language/pattern-types#rest-element"
"...the docs silently go back and forth between using the irrefutable syntax (no var) and the refutable syntax."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
"... the documentation of the different kinds of patterns uses the refutable syntax for some of them, and the irrefutable syntax for others. I wonder whether it would be better to just bite the bullet and document both syntaxes for each pattern type? It would also help drive home the fact that there are two syntaxes. Example here: https://dart.dev/language/pattern-types#rest-element"
"...the docs silently go back and forth between using the irrefutable syntax (no var) and the refutable syntax."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: