You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If we have an embedded object with a field of type Set and this stored in a (join) table, we currently only allow this to be stored in a single table. If the embedded object is embedded in multiple different owner classes then we need to support each embedding owner to specify its own join table.
The methods
RDBMSStoreManager.getTable(AbstractMemberMetaData mmd)
RDBMSStoreManager.getBackingStoreForField(ClassLoaderResolver clr, AbstractMemberMetaData mmd, Class type)
RDBMSStoreManager.getBackingStoreForCollection(AbstractMemberMetaData mmd, ClassLoaderResolver clr, Class type)
RDBMSStoreManager.newJoinTable(Table ownerTable, AbstractMemberMetaData mmd, ClassLoaderResolver clr)
are likely the ones needing updates to support this
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If we have an embedded object with a field of type Set and this stored in a (join) table, we currently only allow this to be stored in a single table. If the embedded object is embedded in multiple different owner classes then we need to support each embedding owner to specify its own join table.
The methods
RDBMSStoreManager.getTable(AbstractMemberMetaData mmd)
RDBMSStoreManager.getBackingStoreForField(ClassLoaderResolver clr, AbstractMemberMetaData mmd, Class type)
RDBMSStoreManager.getBackingStoreForCollection(AbstractMemberMetaData mmd, ClassLoaderResolver clr, Class type)
RDBMSStoreManager.newJoinTable(Table ownerTable, AbstractMemberMetaData mmd, ClassLoaderResolver clr)
are likely the ones needing updates to support this
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: