Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UFAL/Migrate data to dev5:85 - fix refactored data pump #119

Closed
4 of 8 tasks
milanmajchrak opened this issue Nov 10, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
4 of 8 tasks

UFAL/Migrate data to dev5:85 - fix refactored data pump #119

milanmajchrak opened this issue Nov 10, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@milanmajchrak
Copy link
Collaborator

milanmajchrak commented Nov 10, 2023

Problems:

  • handle old- 4560 | new - 4366
  • group2group old- 48 | new - 31
  • epersongroup old- 38 | new - 31
  • workflowitem is not imported (I done some code changes but it is still not working - I thought that problems was caused by imported wrong groups, but after fixing it the workflowitem is still not imported)
  • resourcepolicy: Some resource policies weren't imported because the data pump tried to import resource policies for the items that haven't exist anymore.
  • versionsimported old- 228 | new - 945
  • usermetadata - Some of them weren't imported - maybe it is because the data pump is trying to import user metadata for the bitstream which doesn't exist anymore
  • fix logs on updated groups
@milanmajchrak
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Summary 16.11.2023:
handle - OK (oprava zlych handlov)
metadataschema - OK
bitstreamformatregistry - OK
community, collection - OK
registration_data - 1 missing -> email is null - OK
group - extra 6 -> because READ_DEFAULT (BITSTREAM_READ_DEFAULT and ITEM_READ_DEFAULT) - OK
group2group - extra 17 -> because more groups - OK
eperson - extra 2 -> default - OK
user_registration - extra 2 (test and user) - OK
group2eperson - extra 1 -> default - OK
license_definition, license_label, license_resource_map - OK
license_label_extended_mapping - extra 79 - because we don't use lable_id in license_definition - OK
workspace - OK (there is many workspace without handle for item and info about that, maybe we don't need it...)
workflowitem - OK
item - 1 missing - 4702 - no coll -> no valid - OK
tasklist - OK
bundle, item2bundle - OK

Ostava: bitstream, usermetadata, resourcepolicy a metadatavalue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants