Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to net6.0 and update dependencies #5

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2022
Merged

Upgrade to net6.0 and update dependencies #5

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2022

Conversation

xoofx
Copy link
Contributor

@xoofx xoofx commented Feb 15, 2022

Will probably conflict with #2 but gonna make a separate PR for it

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
{
"sdk": {
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I generally don't pin my SDK versions, but I'm not opposed to it either if there's a reason to. Are we using something in this project that benefits from pinning and might change with later SDKs, or just adding this as a best practice?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, it's to ensure more predictability with local builds. On CI you can control which version is exactly used, not on local builds. But from past experience, I have found some users and also myself had installed a recent .NET preview that could break entirely the build of a project. So usually, I don't like to chase down this kind of issues 😅

Copy link
Owner

@daveaglick daveaglick Feb 15, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Figured that was it, but wanted to be sure I wasn't missing some crazy version compatibility thing that requires a specific SDK to build. Glad it's just plain old .NET build tooling touchiness!

@daveaglick
Copy link
Owner

This is definitely preferable to #2, at least as far as the target updates go. Updating to .NET Standard 2 seems reasonable (#2 goes up to .NET 5), and I'd rather keep these targets as low as possible for this one since it's a utility library. That one also needs some other work, so I'm going to merge this PR and then keep iterating on #2.

@daveaglick daveaglick merged commit a5fba4b into daveaglick:main Feb 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants