Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FR: autostart browsersync by default #58

Closed
tyler36 opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

FR: autostart browsersync by default #58

tyler36 opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@tyler36
Copy link
Collaborator

tyler36 commented Sep 5, 2024

In PR #56 , @rfay said

I wonder if you'll ever want to automate it so the daemon runs automatically with web_extra_daemons.

What are everyones opinions on this?

@tyler36
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tyler36 commented Sep 5, 2024

Personally, I usually only enable browsersync when I'm working on frontend of a site.
I tend to spend most of my time writing PHPunit tests these days so I generally don't have a need to use.

To be honest, I find myself working more and more with Vite, which has auto-refresh, and thus replaces the need for browsersync completely.

Would love to hear how often and prefered workflow for people that regulary use the addon.

@tyler36
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tyler36 commented Dec 12, 2024

Closing.

#60 reworked the docs and includes a "Auto-start the watcher server" section.

There seems to be little call for "auto-start" to be the default.

@tyler36 tyler36 closed this as completed Dec 12, 2024
@rfay
Copy link
Member

rfay commented Dec 12, 2024

Thanks for maintaining this! There is in fact expectation of auto-start that we see doing support, but I think it's important to keep the default what you like it to be.

@tyler36
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tyler36 commented Dec 12, 2024

I do hear some requests in discord and slack; hence #60
I guess I don't hear from people who are happy with the current (non-autostart) implmentation.

This issue was open for 3months with no feedback here so the issue was closed based on that. Happy to discuss here or else where.

@rfay
Copy link
Member

rfay commented Dec 12, 2024

I think your approach is fine, and thanks for explaining how to do the auto-start in #60

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants