Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
According to LAMMPS documentation, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I used DeePMD for generating a NN potential in the .pb format. And I can successfully run MD simulations using this potential, only when the whole system is described by the DeePMD generated potential. I'm using LAMMPS.
However, I'm looking at a specific case where I need part of my system to be described by the DeePMD potential, and the remainder to be described by standard CHARMM/OPLS force fields (similar to QM/MM except instead of QM it'll be the DeePMD potential). I would also like to use the DeePMD potential in conjunction with tabulated pair potentials.
I was trying to use commands of the following type :
pair_style hybrid deepmd graph.pb lj/cut/coul/long 10.0 10.0
pair_style hybrid/overlay deepmd graph.pb lj/cut/coul/long 10.0 10.0
pair_style hybrid deepmd graph.pb table spline 2000
pair_style hybrid/overlay deepmd graph.pb table spline 2000
However, I'm encountering numerous errors including illegal pair style / issues with identifying pair coefficients with the DeePMD potential, etc. This includes the following error:
ERROR: deepmd requires that the scale should be set to all atom types, i.e. pair_coeff * *.
Does the current implementation of DeePMD in LAMMPS support such a hybrid scheme? Or can it be used ONLY when the entire system is described by the DeePMD potential?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions