Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

index prefixes don't list all undocumented opcodes #15

Open
fghsgh opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

index prefixes don't list all undocumented opcodes #15

fghsgh opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@fghsgh
Copy link

fghsgh commented Sep 2, 2024

It used to be that the only undocumented instruction in the DD/FD blocks were ones which actually contained ixh/ixl/iyh/iyl. However, since the Z180 update, many more of these instructions have been added that do not act any differently to the non-prefixed opcodes (other than taking 4cc longer). However, not all such instructions have been added like this. For example, DD80 is listed as an 8cc add a,b, but DD03 is not listed as a 10cc inc bc.

I think that either all such instructions should be added, or otherwise none of them. Adding all makes it clear how DD actually works. Adding a few but not all implies that all the other ones weren't added for a specific reason.

@deeptoaster deeptoaster added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants