[BUG]: prefix with 99- the PowerMax MachineConfig sample for multipathing
#1618
Labels
area/csm-docs
Issue pertains to the CSM Documentation
needs-triage
Issue requires triage.
type/bug
Something isn't working. This is the default label associated with a bug issue.
Comments
coulof
added
needs-triage
|
@coulof: Thank you for submitting this issue! The issue is currently awaiting triage. Please make sure you have given us as much context as possible. If the maintainers determine this is a relevant issue, they will remove the needs-triage label and respond appropriately. We want your feedback! If you have any questions or suggestions regarding our contributing process/workflow, please reach out to us at [email protected]. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Bug Description
There is a convention to index the
MachineConfignames to better control the order of processing.For some reason, one of the sample is not properly prefixed : https://dell.github.io/csm-docs/docs/deployment/csmoperator/drivers/powermax/#linux-multipathing-requirements
Logs
NA
Screenshots
No response
Additional Environment Information
No response
Steps to Reproduce
Read the doc
Expected Behavior
Use convention
CSM Driver(s)
PowerMax
Installation Type
Operator
Container Storage Modules Enabled
No response
Container Orchestrator
OCP 4.17
Operating System
CoreOS
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: