WMS Extension #571
mindless-bureaucrat
started this conversation in
Feature Request
Replies: 1 comment
-
That would be a great addition (as long as it doesn't had big dependencies) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hey Vincent,
Long time fan, first time caller.
I saw your presentation at FOSS4G on TiTiler and immediately went home to implement it. Loving it, great work!
Part of my stack includes an unfortunate legacy web map application that only reads WMS. To remedy this, I've created an additional endpoint to
/cog
and/mosaic
that functions as a lightweight WMS endpoint. The endpoint (/wms
) mainly wraps the.part()
function in factory.Sounds like WMS and older WMS formats are less than sexy these days. Is this WMS feature something you'd be open to integrating to the main library as a PR? Or would this be better suited as a standalone extension? Happy to go either way.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions