From ff4a31b5e6fb19de324cd093e7c801b9c7db102f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Moritz Twente <127845092+mtwente@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:53:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] feat: add submission 480 (#23) Co-authored-by: Christian Forney Co-authored-by: Martin Stuber --- submissions/480/_quarto.yml | 8 + submissions/480/index.qmd | 65 ++++ submissions/480/references.bib | 552 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 625 insertions(+) create mode 100644 submissions/480/_quarto.yml create mode 100644 submissions/480/index.qmd create mode 100644 submissions/480/references.bib diff --git a/submissions/480/_quarto.yml b/submissions/480/_quarto.yml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ae6ece2 --- /dev/null +++ b/submissions/480/_quarto.yml @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +project: + type: manuscript + +manuscript: + article: index.qmd + +format: + html: default diff --git a/submissions/480/index.qmd b/submissions/480/index.qmd new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0a5f075 --- /dev/null +++ b/submissions/480/index.qmd @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +--- +submission_id: 480 +categories: 'Session 3B' +title: Connecting floras and herbaria before 1850 – challenges and lessons learned in digital history of biodiversity +author: + - name: Christian Forney + orcid: 0000-0002-1318-4983 + email: christian.forney@unibe.ch + affiliations: + - University of Berne + - name: Martin Stuber + orcid: 0000-0001-9853-9570 + email: martin.stuber@unibe.ch + affiliations: + - University of Berne +keywords: + - Biodiversity + - Botanical networks + - Digital edition + - Digital herbaria + - Digital humanities + - FAIR data + - History of botany + - Knowledge history +abstract: | + Floras and herbaria are particularly valuable sources both for historical analyses of the collaborative knowledge culture of botany and for research into historical biodiversity. Therefore, the digital representation of this complementary sources should fulfil the requirements of the humanities and natural sciences as well. In this paper, we describe challenges, solutions and lessons learned in this regard as a summary of experiences from multiple projects on the data and edition platform _hallerNet_ around the Bernese polymath Albrecht von Haller (1708–1777). +date: 08-08-2024 +bibliography: references.bib +--- + +## Introduction + +To start with some definitions, the term “flora” – in the sense of a document – denotes a directory in which the plant species of a specific area are systematically listed, often together with a description and additional information. “Herbarium” refers to a collection of preserved (usually dried and pressed) plants or fungi for scientific purposes; an individual botanical object in a herbarium collected at a specific place and time is called a “specimen” [@Wagenitz2003]. + +## Floras and herbaria in the history of knowledge + +Both the flora and the herbarium are regarded as decisive innovations in the development of botany into an independent scientific discipline from the mid-16th century onwards. Together with the botanical garden, which is functionally related and established in the same period [@Rieppel2016; @Findlen2006a], only the invention of the herbarium made it possible to work out regional floras based on systematic empirical fieldwork [@Flannery2023; @Müller-Wille2019]. Paula Findlen summarised the motivation behind this crucial invention: “The more naturalists observed nature in situ, the more they realized that limited contact with specimens did not yet yield enough knowledge to describe and compare medicinal herbs. They needed to take nature home” [@Findlen2006b, p. 447; see @Sunderland2016]. Findlen stands for the history of knowledge or the renewed history of science that firstly emphasises the shift from finalised knowledge to the act of its production, secondly shows an increased interest in the everyday intellectual life of small groups, circles or networks and thirdly focuses on practices and material cultures of knowledge [@Müller-WilleEtAl2017; @FörschlerMariss2017; @HolensteinSteinkeStuber2013]. In this perspective and with the catchy phrase “collecting as knowledge”, the creation of a natural history collection, such as a herbarium, is seen as knowledge production [@HeesenSpary2001]. The activity of collecting expresses not only the fact that dispersed natural objects are brought together in a single location, but also that the forms of representation associated with them, such as illustrations, descriptions, lists and publications, are included in the repositories, where they are available for comparison, retracing and synoptic synthesis [@Klemun2017, p. 235]. + +The precise structures and functions of floras and herbaria with their spatial relations between local and global can only be understood in the context of the “collaborative knowledge culture of botany”. Therefore the interplay of the three central resources on which botany depended in early modern times has to be reconstructed: living and dried plants, relevant specialised literature (e.g. floras) and correspondence [@Dietz2017a; @Dietz2017b]. The nexus of correspondence, plant transfer and collection policy was first reconstructed by Emma Spary using the example of the network of André Thouin (1747–1824), director of the _Jardin du Roi_ in Paris [@Spary2000, pp. 49-98]. The analysis of such networks draws attention to the extensive transfer of dried plants and seeds as the basis of knowledge production [@DauserEtAl2008]. A wide variety of methods has been used to correspond efficiently, to save time and to avoid loss of information. First and foremost is the use of reference catalogues. This means that lists of transmitted or desired plant species could simply be referred to the numbers that had been assigned to the species in an published flora [@Dietz2017a, pp. 96-99]. Secondly, network analyses show that natural history owes its existence not only to the outstanding figures, but also developed through the participation of thousands of amateurs working locally [@Klemun2017, p. 239]. Correspondence networks not only serve to improve understanding of herbaria and floras, it is also possible to go in the opposite direction: herbaria themselves can serve as a source for social network analyses by systematically evaluating the collectors of the individual specimen [@SiracusaEtAl2020; @GroomOReillyHumphrey2014]. + +## Digitisation of herbaria from a botanical perspective + +The value of herbaria has long been recognized in the fields of taxonomy, systematics and biogeography. Moreover, in recent decades they have proven to be fundamental for dealing with the biology of climate change, biodiversity, phenology, conservation and biological invasions. Given the high scientific and cultural value of herbarium collections, many efforts to make them more accessible have already been made in the last 20 years. Digitization is an essential first step in the process of transforming this vast amount of data associated with physical specimen into flexible digital data formats that allow information to be re-categorized according to variable criteria [@Roma-Marzio2023, p. 108; see generally @AndraschkeWagner2020]. Building on centuries of research based on herbarium specimens collected over time and around the globe, which are freely accessible and aggregable, a “new era” of discovery, synthesis and prediction using digitized collection data is postulated [@JamesEtAl2018; @NelsonEllis2018]. Digitization and online availability of specimen facilitates the rapid exploration and dissemination of accurate biodiversity data on an unprecedented scale: “The emerging ‘herbarium of the future’ (or the ‘global metaherbarium’) will be the central element guiding the exploration, illumination, and prediction of plant biodiversity change in the Anthropocene” [@Davis2023, p. 412]. +It should be borne in mind that collections are usually associated with various distortions that need to be characterised and mitigated to make data usable. Most common are taxonomic and collector biases, which can be understood as the effects of particular recording preferences of key collectors on the overall taxonomic composition of the biological collections to which they contribute [@SiracusaEtAl2020; @Davis2023, p. 421; @JaroszynskaEtAl2023]. In order to capture such phenomena so that they can be taken into account in the data analysis, precise knowledge of the entire context in which a herbarium was created is required. This is exactly the aim of the approach described above under history of knowledge. Obviously, there is a bridge here between the research interests of the natural sciences and the humanities. +An overview published in 2024 shows that the topic of accessibility and digitization of herbaria as “archives of biodiversity” has also gained new relevance in Switzerland in recent years. Apart from two major exceptions, the [_Platter-Herbarium_](https://www.burgerbib.ch/de/bestaende/privatarchive/einzelstuecke/platter-herbarium) and [_Les Herbiers de Rousseau_](https://lesherbiersderousseau.org/), there have been no attempts to do this in an interdisciplinary context [@Stämpfli2024]. Additionally there is a lack of including the interaction with the functionally linked correspondence networks and contemporary floras. For this reason, the experience with historical plants gained on _hallerNet_, on which we pursued an interdisciplinary approach to the interaction between different types of entities (letters, species, specimens, reviews), may be of general interest. + +## Historical plants on the data and edition platform _hallerNet_ + +The data and edition platform [_hallerNet_](https://hallernet.org/) opens up historical networks of knowledge in Switzerland in their European interconnectedness. The basis of the currently around 128,000 data objects is formed by extensive prosopographical and bibliographical data that has been compiled in a relational database (FAUST) since the early 1990s as part of three SNSF projects at the University of Bern. A transformation project (2016–2019) transferred this extensively interlinked data into a XML data structure compliant to the [_Text Encoding Initiative (TEI)_](https://tei-c.org/) and thus turned it into “reusable research data” based on the [_FAIR_](https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/) data criteria [@DängeliStuber2020]. The platform nowadays contains, among others, around 46,000 publications, 31,000 persons and 1,200 institutions, which are systematically linked to 9,000 edited reviews and 5,000 edited letters. In our context, the 4,955 plant entities currently on _hallerNet_ are at the centre. Starting point were the 1,737 species of flowering plants mentioned in Haller's Swiss Flora _Historia Stirpium_ [@Haller1768], which were systematically referenced in the aforementioned relational database to Haller's first edition of the Swiss Flora _Enumeratio_ [@Haller1742], to Linné's _Species plantarum_ [@Linné1753] and to the current nomenclature. This concordance between Haller's and Linné's nomenclature, compiled by Luc Lienhard with reference to Johan Rudolf Suter's _Flora Helvetica_ [@Suter1802], not only makes Haller's Swiss flora accessible, but does also provide access to pre-Linnaean botany in general. On this basis, we transformed the botanical data, which was originally divided into four different data types, for the new XML structure into a generic data model based on today's plant entities ([_InfoFlora_](https://www.infoflora.ch/de/), [_Global Biodiversity Information Facility GBIF_](https://www.gbif.org/)), and treat their (historical) names as name variants. In this way, entities become flexibly adaptable for other historical floras that are partly or completely outside Haller's and Linné's nomenclature. At the same time, the data model structured according to today's nomenclature facilitates reference to current issues in historical ecology. The following summary of realized, initiated or planned expansions illustrates this double advantage. + +* **Ecological data**: The diverse ecological information in Haller's _Historia_ on habitat, frequency, typical altitudinal range and specific localities is of far above-average quality for the 18th century [@Lienhard2005]. _hallerNet_ systematically records a total of 7,545 locality details, whereby the 1,920 different localities have been georeferenced for the most part as kilometre squares with their corner points and additionally linked to the neighbouring municipalities (‘populated places’) in order to appear in the _hallerNet_ place register. Haller's extraordinary data is thus available in a flexible structure whose exploration is only just beginning [@Lienhard2008; @Lienhard2000]. Historical biodiversity research, which is high on the agenda of environmental history [@GoethemZandem2019], has a wealth of source material at its disposal. Using appropriate methods of analysis, this will massively extend its temporal scope [@JaroszynskaEtAl2023; @WangEtAl2023; @StöckliEtAl2012; @Lachat2010]. + +* **Collectors and correspondents**: Haller's _Historia_ also often includes the collector to whom Haller owes the information. These 109 people are all curated on _hallerNet_ and systematically referenced for each species (1,342 times in total). The network is to be further expanded by systematically labelling the plants mentioned in Haller's botanical correspondence, some of which has already been edited on _hallerNet_ and most of which are made accessible via the [_International Image Interoperability Framework (IIIF)_](https://iiif.io). How great the potential of the correspondence is, both for the reconstruction of the ‘knowledge culture’ and for the supplementation and specification of the location data, is demonstrated by some analyses already available [@Favre2021; @Hächler2008; @Lienhard2005]. + +* **Book references and reviews**: For his extensive information on the plant species of his Swiss flora, Haller also uses a vast amount of historical data from his predecessors. For example synonyms and place references, which have already been added to _hallerNet_. Together with the links to Hallers other botanical publications [@SteinkeProfos2004, pp. 186-195], to the numerous botanical publications in Hallers personal library [@Monti1983-1994, integrated in _hallerNet_] and to Hallers countless botanical reviews in the _Göttingische Gelehrten Anzeigen_, all of which are available in edited form on _hallerNet_, the integral process of botanical knowledge production could be precisely reconstructed [see @DietzSubm; @Lienhard2005]. + +* **Useful plants**: 656 species or varieties are listed in a total of eleven systematic catalogues in the context of the _Bernese Economic Society_, which was presided over by Haller. In this catalogues, the Latin-universal plant names were consistently linked to the dialectal-regional plant names. On _hallerNet_, 755 actions are linked to them, most of which obtained from the meetings of the _Economic Society_ [@StuberLienhard2007; @Stuber2008]. This reveals a wide range of interferences between botany and agricultural botany [@DauserStuberSubm; @Gerber-VisserStuber2019; @Stuber2018; @BoscaniStuber2017]. + +* **Herbaria**: The digitisation of Haller's herbaria is one of the most intruding unfulfilled postulates in the study of Haller's botany and beyond. Haller's main herbarium, which after being sold by his heirs to Emperor Joseph II was first sent to Pavia and later to Paris by Napoleon, is now in the _Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle_ and comprises more than 10,000 specimens in a total of 60 volumes (including 8 volumes of cryptogams) [@MargézAupicLamy2006; @Zoller1958a]; further there is a smaller herbarium by Haller in Göttingen [@Zoller1958b]. Due to the fact that the current location of Haller's herbaria is not in Switzerland, its digitization is not in scope of being supported by the ongoing [_SwissCollNet_](https://swisscollnet.scnat.ch) project, the national initiative for the digitization of natural history collections [@FrickStiegerScheidegger2019]. As part of _SwissCollNet_, however, the lichen herbarium of Jean-Frédéric Chaillet (1747–1839), which is kept in the _Neuchâtel herbarium_ (NEU), has now been edited on _hallerNet_ as sub-project _Lichens of the Enlightenment_ led by Jason Grant. This is consequent in terms of content, as Chaillet operated as a direct Swiss successor to Haller and referred to him wherever possible. At the same time, it represents a milestone for _hallerNet_, as the platform data structures for Herbaria could be developed. The centrepiece are the 943 lichen specimens, which firstly contain the transcribed original information on the label. Secondly, they are linked to the original scan via [_IIIF_](https://iiif.io/api/image) and additionally with positional accuracy, as there are several specimens sticked on one herbarium page. Thirdly, they are assigned to the species entities, which point to authority data ([_GBIF_](https://www.gbif.org/), [_Index Fungorum_](https://www.indexfungorum.org), [_SwissLichens_](https://swisslichens.wsl.ch)). This species entities also contain the data from historical floras, in this case all from the manuscript flora by Chaillet and, where already listed, from Haller's _Historia_. The information from historical floras is often the decisive key to relate the objects in a herbarium to present-day taxonomic databases. The assignment of source terms to standardised data is thus presented transparently on the platform, which is particularly essential for a period in which botanical nomenclature is still very unstable. Additionally, the structure of the data follows [Darwin Core](https://dwc.tdwg.org/) standard which facilitates the connection to other systems such as the Neuchâtel Herbarium, the emerging _SwissCollNet_ database or the global [_Index Herbariorum_](https://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/) [@VustEtAl]. + +* **Plant lists**: The connectivity of _hallerNet_ is also demonstrated by Meike Knittel's ongoing guest edition of plant lists in the circle of the Zurich botanist Johannes Gessner (1709–1790), the _Naturforschende Gesellschaft_ and the botanical garden, which document the actual exchange of seeds and list a total of 1,829 individual actions [see @Knittel]. + +## Conclusion + +Reconstructing the whole interaction in which floras and herbaria interplayed, difficulties arise in integrating digital approaches to historical correspondence networks [e.g. @EdmondsonEdelstein2019] with digitization methods for floras and herbaria, which are located in different scientific disciplines. The challenge for the data and edition platform [_hallerNet_](https://hallernet.org/) is therefore to find interdisciplinary solutions. With tools, methods and workflows of the digital humanities, traceable relations between text, scans and structural data are determined in an innovative way. That allows to rely today's botanical authority data systematically to the historical information such as changing plant names, specimens, locality information and plant collectors. For the interoperability of the data, the orientation towards the [Darwin Core](https://dwc.tdwg.org/) standard is mandatory, for the sustainable editorial quality the [_TEI_](https://tei-c.org/) guidelines. Originally developed in the natural sciences, the [_FAIR data principles_](https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/) became a standard in the humanities (especially for _GLAM_ institutions), and thus serve as an overarching guideline; in particular, _FAIR_ guarantees the sustainable handling of data, which therefore remains 'reusable' for future generations of users because the traces of the normalization and flexibilization processes can be traced in detail. With this integration of different disciplinary standards and different types of sources, _hallerNet_ could become a dynamic and cross-collection instrument for the interdisciplinary research of historical plants and biodiversity in Switzerland in the period before 1850. The current transformation of _hallerNet_ into the national collaborative platform _République des Lettres_ will further strengthen this potential. diff --git a/submissions/480/references.bib b/submissions/480/references.bib new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b076588 --- /dev/null +++ b/submissions/480/references.bib @@ -0,0 +1,552 @@ +@book{AndraschkeWagner2020, + title = {Objekte im Netz. Wissenschaftliche Sammlungen im digitalen Wandel}, + editor = {Andraschke, Udo and Wagner, Sarah}, + date = {2020}, + location = {Bielefeld}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@book{BoscaniStuber2017, + title = {Wer das Gras wachsen hört. Wissensgeschichte(n) der pflanzlichen Ressourcen vom Mittelalter bis ins 20. Jahrhundert}, + editor = {Boscani Leoni, Simona and Stuber, Martin}, + date = {2017}, + series = {Jahrbuch für Geschichte des ländlichen Raumes 14}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@article{DängeliStuber2020, + author = {Dängeli, Peter and Stuber, Martin}, + title = {Nachhaltigkeit in langjährigen Erschliessungsprojekten. FAIR-Data Kriterien bei Editions- und Forschungsplattformen zum 18. Jahrhundert}, + journal = {xviii.ch, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für die Erforschung des 18. Jahrhunderts / Revue suisse d’études sur le XVIIIe siècle}, + date = {2020}, + volume = {11}, + pages = {34--51}, + doi = {10.24894/2673-4419.0000410.1515/9783486712339}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@book{DauserEtAl2008, + title = {Wissen im Netz. Botanik und Pflanzentransfer in europäischen Korrespondenznetzen des 18. Jahrhunderts}, + editor = {Dauser, Regina and Hächler, Stefan and Kempe, Michael and Mauelshagen, Franz and Stuber, Martin}, + date = {2008}, + location = {Berlin}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@inbook{DauserStuberSubm, + author = {Dauser, Regina and Stuber, Martin}, + title = {Pflanzliche Ressourcen – Interferenzen zwischen Botanik und Ökonomischer Aufklärung}, + editor = {Stuber, Martin and Metz, Bernhard and Steinke, Hubert}, + booktitle = {Korrespondenz und Kritik. Albrecht von Haller als paradigmatische Figur der entstehenden Scientific Community}, + year = {submittet}, + location = {Göttingen}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@article{Davis2023, + author = {Davis, Charles C.}, + title = {The herbarium of the future}, + journal = {Trends in Ecology & Evolution}, + date = {2023}, + volume = {38 (5)}, + pages = {412--423}, + doi = {10.1016/j.tree.2022.11.015}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@book{Dietz2017a, + author = {Dietz, Bettina}, + title = {Das System der Natur. Die kollaborative Wissenskultur der Botanik im 18. Jahrhundert}, + date = {2017}, + location = {Köln u.a.}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@inbook{Dietz2017b, + author = {Dietz, Bettina}, + title = {Kollaboration in der Botanik des 18. Jahrhunderts. Die partizipative Architektur von Linnés System der Natur}, + editor = {Förschler, Silke and Mariss, Anne}, + booktitle = {Verfahrensweisen der Naturgeschichte in der Frühen Neuzeit. Akteure Tiere Dinge}, + date = {2017}, + location = {Köln}, + pages = {93--108}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@inbook{DietzSubm, + author = {Dietz, Bettina}, + title = {Orte der Kritik in der Botanik des 18. Jahrhunderts}, + editor = {Stuber, Martin and Metz, Bernhard and Steinke, Hubert}, + booktitle = {Korrespondenz und Kritik. Albrecht von Haller als paradigmatische Figur der entstehenden Scientific Community}, + year = {submittet}, + location = {Göttingen}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@inbook{DrouinLienhard2008, + author = {Drouin, Jean-Marc and Lienhard, Luc}, + title = {Botanik}, + editor = {Steinke, Hubert and Boschung, Urs and Pross, Wolfgang}, + booktitle = {Albrecht von Haller. Leben, Werk, Epoche}, + date = {2008}, + location = {Göttingen}, + pages = {292--314}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@book{EdmondsonEdelstein2019, + title = {Networks of Enlightenment. Digital approaches to the Republic of Letters}, + editor = {Edmondson, Chloe and Edelstein, Dan}, + date = {2019}, + location = {Oxford}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@inbook{Favre2021, + author = {Favre, Madline}, + title = {Réseaux, pratiques et motivations des acteures locaux de la recherche botanique en milieu alpin. Le cas du Valais entre 1750 et 1810}, + editor = {Boscani Leoni, Simona and Head, Anne-Lise and Lorenzetti, Luigi}, + booktitle = {Histoire naturelle et montagnes – Storia naturale e montagne – Naturgeschichte und Berge}, + date = {2021}, + series = {Histoire des Alpes / Storia delle Alpi / Geschichte der Alpen 26}, + pages = {32--49}, + langid = {french}, +} + +@inbook{Findlen2006a, + author = {Findlen, Paula}, + title = {Anatomy Theaters, Botanical Gardens, and Natural History Collections}, + editor = {Park, Katharina and Daston, Lorraine}, + booktitle = {Early Modern Science}, + date = {2006}, + series = {The Cambridge History of Science 3}, + location = {Cambridge}, + pages = {272--289}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@inbook{Findlen2006b, + author = {Findlen, Paula}, + title = {Natural History}, + editor = {Park, Katharina and Daston, Lorraine}, + booktitle = {Early Modern Science}, + date = {2006}, + series = {The Cambridge History of Science 3}, + location = {Cambridge}, + pages = {435--468}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@book{Flannery2023, + title = {In the Herbarium: the Hidden World of Collecting and Preserving Plants}, + author = {Flannery, Maura C.}, + date = {2023}, + location = {New Haven}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@book{FörschlerMariss2017, + title = {Akteure, Tiere, Dinge : Verfahrensweisen der Naturgeschichte in der Frühen Neuzeit}, + editor = {Förschler, Silke and Mariss, Anne}, + date = {2017}, + location = {Köln}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@article{FrickStiegerScheidegger2019, + author = {Frick, Holger and Stieger, Pia and Scheidegger, Christoph}, + title = {SwissCollNet – A National Initiative for Natural History Collections in Switzerland}, + journal = {Biodiversity Information Science and Standards}, + date = {2019}, + volume = {3: e37188}, + doi = {10.3897/biss.3.37188}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@inbook{Gerber-VisserStuber2019, + author = {Gerber-Visser, Gerrendina and Stuber, Martin}, + title = {Naturgeschichte Helvetiens als Projekt der Ökonomischen Aufklärung. Jakob Samuel Wyttenbachs Forschungsbericht (1788) und Albrecht Höpfners Magazin (1787-1789)}, + editor = {Holenstein, André and Jaquier, Claire and Léchot, Timothée and Schläppi, Daniel}, + booktitle = {Politische, gelehrte und imaginierte Schweiz. Kohäsion und Disparität im Corpus helveticum des 18. Jahrhunderts}, + date = {2019}, + location = {Genève}, + pages = {225--252}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@article{GoethemZandem2019, + author = {Goethem, Thomas van and Zanden, Jan Luiten van}, + title = {Who is Afraid of Biodiversity? Proposal for a Research Agenda for Environmental History}, + journal = {Environment and History}, + date = {2019}, + volume = {25}, + pages = {613--647}, + doi = {10.3197/096734018X15254461646440}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@article{GroomOReillyHumphrey2014, + author = {Groom, Quentin and O’Reilly, C. and Humphrey, T.}, + title = {Herbarium specimens reveal the exchange network of British and Irish botanists, 1856–1932}, + journal = {New Journal of Botany}, + date = {2014}, + volume = {4, 2}, + pages = {95--103}, + doi = {10.1179/2042349714Y.0000000041}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@inbook{Hächler2008, + author = {Hächler, Stefan}, + title = {Avec une grosse boete de plantes vertes. Pflanzentransfer in der Korrespon-denz Albrecht von Hallers (1708-1777)}, + booktitle = {Wissen im Netz. Botanik und Pflanzentransfer in europäischen Korrespondenznetzen des 18. Jahrhunderts}, + editor = {Dauser, Regina and Hächler, Stefan and Kempe, Michael and Mauelshagen, Franz and Stuber, Martin}, + date = {2008}, + location = {Berlin}, + pages = {201--218}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@book{Haller1742, + title = {Enumeratio methodica stirpium Helvetiae indigenarum}, + author = {Haller, Albrecht von}, + date = {1742}, + location = {Gottingae}, + publisher = {ex officina academica Abrami Vandenhoek}, + langid = {latin}, +} + +@book{Haller1768, + title = {Historia stirpium indigenarum Helvetiae inchoata}, + author = {Haller, Albrecht von}, + date = {1768}, + location = {Bernae}, + publisher = {sumptibus Societatis typographicae}, + langid = {latin}, +} + +@book{HeesenSpary2001, + title = {Sammeln als Wissen}, + editor = {Heesen, Anke te and Spary, Emma C.}, + date = {2001}, + location = {Göttingen}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@book{HolensteinSteinkeStuber2013, + title = {Scholars in Action. The Practice of Knowledge and the Figure of the Savant in the 18th Century}, + editor = {Holenstein, André and Steinke, Hubert and Stuber, Martin}, + date = {2013}, + location = {Leiden and Boston}, + edition = {2 vols.}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@article{JamesEtAl2018, + author = {James, Shelley A and Soltis, PS. and Belbin, L. and Chapman, AD. and Nelson, G. and Paul, DL. and Collins, M.}, + title = {Herbarium data: Global biodiversity and societal botanical needs for novel research}, + journal = {Applications in Plant Sciences}, + date = {2018}, + volume = {6, 2: e1024}, + doi = {10.1002/aps3.1024}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@article{JaroszynskaEtAl2023, + author = {Jaroszynska, Francesca and Rixen, Christian and Woodin, Sarah and Lenoir, Jonathan and Wipf, Sonja}, + title = {Resampling alpine herbarium records reveals changes in plant traits over space and time}, + journal = {Journal of Ecology}, + date = {2023}, + volume = {111 (2)}, + pages = {338--355}, + doi = {10.1111/1365-2745.14062}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@inbook{Klemun2017, + author = {Klemun, Marianne}, + title = {Gärten und Sammlungen}, + editor = {Sommer, Marianne and Müller-Wille, Staffan and Reinhard, Carsten}, + booktitle = {Handbuch Wissenschaftsgeschichte}, + date = {2017}, + location = {Stuttgart}, + pages = {235--244}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@book{Knittel, + title = {Blühende Beziehungen. Botanische Praktiken im Zürich des 18. Jahrhunderts}, + author = {Knittel, Meike}, + year = {in print}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@book{Lachat2010, + title = {Wandel der Biodiversität in der Schweiz seit 1900: ist die Talsohle erreicht?}, + editor = {Lachat, Thibault}, + date = {2010}, + location = {Bern u.a.}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@inbook{Lienhard2000, + author = {Lienhard, Luc}, + title = {Haller et la découverte botanique des Alpes}, + editor = {Pont, Jean-Claude and Lacki, Jan}, + booktitle = {Une cordée originale. Histoire des relations entre science et montagne}, + date = {2000}, + location = {Chêne-Bourg}, + pages = {96--119}, + langid = {french}, +} + +@inbook{Lienhard2005, + author = {Lienhard, Luc}, + title = {La machine botanique. Zur Entstehung von Hallers Flora der Schweiz}, + editor = {Stuber, Martin and Hächler, Stefan and Lienhard, Luc}, + booktitle = {Hallers Netz. Ein europäischer Gelehrtenbriefwechsel zur Zeit der Aufklärung}, + date = {2005}, + location = {Basel}, + pages = {371--410}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@inbook{Lienhard2008, + author = {Lienhard, Luc}, + title = {Wegränder, Wiesen, Sümpfe – Flora und Lebensräume}, + editor = {Holenstein, André and Schläppi, Daniel and Schnell, Dieter and Steinke, Hubert and Stuber, Martin and Würgler, Andreas}, + booktitle = {Berns goldene Zeit. Das 18. Jahrhundert neu entdeckt}, + date = {2008}, + location = {Bern}, + pages = {56--59}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@book{Linné1753, + title = {Species plantarum}, + author = {Linné, Carl von}, + date = {1753}, + location = {Stockholm}, + publisher = {Laurenz Salvi}, + langid = {latin}, +} + +@article{MargézAupicLamy2006, + author = {Margéz, Marlène and Aupic, Cécile and Lamy, Denis}, + title = {La restauration de l’herbier Haller du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle}, + journal = {Support tracé}, + date = {2006}, + volume = {5}, + pages = {354--360}, + langid = {french}, +} + +@book{Monti1983-1994, + title = {Catalogo del Fondo Haller della Biblioteca Nazionale Braidense di Milano}, + editor = {Monti, Maria Teresa}, + date = {1983/1994}, + location = {Milano}, + edition = {13 vols.}, + langid = {italian}, +} + +@inreference{Müller-Wille2019, + author = {Müller-Wille, Staffan}, + title = {Botanik}, + booktitle = {Enzyklopädie der Neuzeit Online}, + date = {2019}, + doi = {10.1163/2352-0248_edn_COM_248430}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@inbook{Müller-WilleEtAl2017, + author = {Müller-Wille, Staffan and Carsten, Reinhardt and Sommer, Marianne}, + title = {Wissenschaftsgeschichte und Wissensgeschichte}, + editor = {Sommer, Marianne and Müller-Wille, Staffan and Reinhard, Carsten}, + booktitle = {Handbuch Wissenschaftsgeschichte}, + date = {2017}, + location = {Stuttgart}, + pages = {2--18}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@article{NelsonEllis2018, + author = {Nelson, Gil and Ellis, Shari}, + title = {The history and impact of digitization and digital data mobilization on biodiversity research}, + journal = {Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B}, + date = {2018}, + volume = {374: 2017039}, + doi = {10.1098/rstb.2017.0391}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@inbook{Rieppel2016, + author = {Rieppel, Lukas}, + title = {Museums and Botanical Gardens}, + editor = {Lightman, Bernard}, + booktitle = {A Companion to the History of Science}, + date = {2016}, + location = {Oxford u.a.}, + pages = {238--251}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@article{Roma-Marzio2023, + author = {Roma-Marzio, Francesco and Maccioni, S. and Dolci, D. and Astuti, G. and Magrini, N. and Pierotti, F. and Vangelisti, R. and Amadei, L. and Peruzzi, L.}, + title = {Digitization of the historical Herbarium of Michele Guadagno at Pisa (PI-GUAD)}, + journal = {PhytoKeys}, + date = {2023}, + volume = {234}, + pages = {107--125}, + doi = {10.3897/phytokeys.234.109464}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@article{SiracusaEtAl2020, + author = {Siracusa, Pedro C. and Gadelha, Jr. and Luiz, M.R. and Ziviani, Arthur}, + title = {New perspectives on analysing data from biological collections based on social network analytics}, + journal = {Sci Rep}, + date = {2020}, + volume = {10, 3358}, + doi = {10.1038/s41598-020-60134-y}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@book{Spary2000, + title = {Utopias Garden : French Natural History from the Old Regime to Revolution}, + author = {Spary, Emma}, + date = {2000}, + location = {London}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@inbook{Stämpfli2024, + author = {Stämpfli, Remo}, + title = {Pflanzen im Netz: Die Möglichkeiten des Digitalen bei der Erschliessung und Vermittlung von Herbarien und Herbarbelegen}, + booktitle = {Informationswissenschaft: Theorie, Methode Und Praxis}, + date = {2024}, + volume = {8 (1)}, + pages = {123--144}, + doi = {10.18755/iw.2024.8}, + langid = {ngerman}, + +} + +@book{SteinkeProfos2004, + title = {Bibliographia Halleriana. Verzeichnis der Schriften von und über Albrecht von Haller}, + editor = {Steinke, Hubert and Profos, Claudia}, + date = {2004}, + location = {Basel}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@article{StöckliEtAl2012, + author = {Stöckli, Veronika and Wipf, S. and Nilsson, C. and Rixen, C.}, + title = {Using historical plant surveys to track biodiversity on mountain summits Plant}, + journal = {Ecology and Diversity}, + date = {2012}, + volume = {4}, + pages = {415--425}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@inbook{Stuber2008, + author = {Stuber, Martin}, + title = {Kulturpflanzentransfer im Netz der Oekonomischen Gesellschaft Bern}, + booktitle = {Wissen im Netz. Botanik und Pflanzentransfer in europäischen Korrespondenznetzen des 18. Jahrhunderts}, + editor = {Dauser, Regina and Hächler, Stefan and Kempe, Michael and Mauelshagen, Franz and Stuber, Martin}, + date = {2008}, + location = {Berlin}, + pages = {229--269}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@inbook{Stuber2018, + author = {Stuber, Martin}, + title = {Vom Simmental bis Spitzbergen. Albrecht von Haller als europäischer Vermittler regionaler Kultur und Ökonomie}, + editor = {Eibach, Joachim and Opitz- Belakhal, Claudia}, + booktitle = {Zwischen den Kulturen. Mittler und Grenzgänger vom 17. bis 19. Jahrhundert}, + date = {2018}, + location = {Hannover}, + pages = {165--189}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@inbook{StuberLienhard2007, + author = {Stuber, Martin and Lienhard, Luc}, + title = {Nützliche Pflanzen. Systematische Pflanzenverzeichnisse von Wild- und Kulturpflanzen im Umfeld der Oekonomischen Gesellschaft}, + editor = {Holenstein, André and Stuber, Martin and Gerber-Visser, Gerrendina}, + booktitle = {Nützliche Wissenschaft und Ökonomie im Ancien Régime. Akteure, Themen, Kommunikationsformen}, + date = {2007}, + pages = {65--106}, + series = {Cardanus. Jahrbuch für Wissenschaftsgeschichte 7}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@inbook{Sunderland2016, + author = {Sunderland, Mary E.}, + title = {Specimens and Collections}, + editor = {Lightman, Bernard}, + booktitle = {A Companion to the History of Science}, + date = {2016}, + location = {Oxford u.a.}, + pages = {488--499}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@book{Suter1802, + title = {Helvetiens Flora, worinn alle im Hallerischen Werke enthaltenen und seither neu entdeckten Schweizer Pflanzen nach Linné's Methode aufgestellt sind}, + author = {Suter, Johann Rudolf}, + date = {1802}, + location = {s.l.}, + edition = {2 Bde.}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@inbook{VustEtAl, + title = {Historical herbarium as a challenge for the Digital humanities - Chaillet's lichens herbarium as pilot project}, + author = {Vust, Mathias and Di Maio, Edouard and Forney, Christian and Stuber, Martin}, + booktitle = {Usages, pratiques et fonctions des herbiers historiques / Uses, practices and functions of historical herbaria}, + series = {Actes Colloque Ascona}, + year = {in prep.}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@book{Wagenitz2003, + title = {Wörterbuch der Botanik}, + author = {Wagenitz, Gerhard}, + date = {2003}, + location = {Heidelberg. Berlin}, + edition = {2. Aufl.}, + langid = {ngerman}, +} + +@article{WangEtAl2023, + author = {Wang, Jessica and Fischer, Markus and Eggenberg, Stefan and Rembold, Katja}, + title = {The impact of climate change on plant distribution and niche dynamics over the past 250 years in Switzerland}, + journal = {Bauhinia}, + date = {2023}, + volume = {29}, + pages = {101--112}, + langid = {english}, +} + +@article{Zoller1958a, + author = {Zoller, Heinrich}, + title = {A l’occasion du 250e anniversaire de albrecht von Haller: quelques remarques sur son oeuvre botanique et ses collections}, + journal = {Bulletin de Museum national d’histoire naturelle}, + date = {1958}, + volume = {série 2, t. 30, no 3}, + pages = {305--312}, + langid = {french}, +} + +@article{Zoller1958b, + author = {Zoller, Heinrich}, + title = {Albrecht von Hallers Pflanzensammlungen in Göttingen, sein botanisches Werk und sein Verhältnis zu Carl von Linné}, + journal = {Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen}, + date = {1958}, + volume = {2, Mathematisch-physikalische Klasse, Nr. 10}, + pages = {217--251}, + langid = {ngerman}, +}