Submission 427, Politycki/Sonder

[mtwente]

Pull request

Proposed changes

• add submission 427 (https://github.com/Bpolitycki/ssrq-paper-digihistch24)
• remove placeholder files

Co-Authored-By: Bastian Politycki [email protected]
Co-Authored-By: Christian Sonder [email protected]

Types of changes

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
• Enhancement (non-breaking change which enhances functionality)
• Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change).

Checklist

• I have read the README document.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have mentioned all co-authors in the PR description as Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced a YAML configuration for manuscript projects, enhancing structured project management and publication readiness.
  • Added a comprehensive manuscript file outlining modern software engineering practices for digital humanities projects, emphasizing XML schema development and sustainable software solutions.
  • Implemented a references file in BibTeX format, providing a well-organized collection of bibliographic entries for academic referencing.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes encompass the introduction of a new YAML configuration for a manuscript, a comprehensive manuscript file that outlines modern software engineering practices within digital humanities, and the creation of a bibliographic reference file. These updates collectively aim to enhance project organization, improve documentation, and ensure sustainable development practices in a long-term research initiative.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
submissions/427/_quarto.yml	New YAML configuration defines manuscript type, structure, and output format for HTML generation.
submissions/427/index.qmd	New manuscript file details software engineering practices for digital humanities, including XML schema development and test-driven practices.
submissions/427/references.bib	New BibTeX file with a comprehensive collection of bibliographic entries relevant to software engineering and digital humanities.

Poem

In fields of code where bunnies dwell,
New paths were paved, a tale to tell.
With YAML dreams and schemas bright,
We hop through bytes, a joyful flight!
In libraries vast, our knowledge grows,
For every line, a story flows. 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between aed60d0 and a1e6dde.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• submissions/427/images/schema-pipeline.png is excluded by !**/*.png

Files selected for processing (3)

• submissions/427/_quarto.yml (1 hunks)
• submissions/427/index.qmd (1 hunks)
• submissions/427/references.bib (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• submissions/427/_quarto.yml

Additional comments not posted (22)

submissions/427/references.bib (16)

2-16: Entry informatik_software_2019 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

---

18-25: Entry text_encoding_initiative_guidelines_2024 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

---

27-38: Entry knuth_literate_1992 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

---

40-52: Entry haaf_enabling_2016 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

---

54-61: Entry law_sources_foundation_of_the_swiss_lawyers_society_collection_2024 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

---

63-78: Entry alsaqqa_agile_2020 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

---

80-87: Entry text_encoding_initiative_roma_2024 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

---

89-98: Entry politycki_tei-xml_2024 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

---

100-115: Entry carver_survey_2022 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

---

117-124: Entry van_zundert_what_2018 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

---

126-131: Entry porter_what_2024 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

---

133-143: Entry neuber_digitale_2023 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

---

145-151: Entry christie_mkdocs_2024 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

---

153-160: Entry law_sources_foundation_of_the_swiss_lawyers_society_transkriptionsrichtlinien_2024 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

---

162-168: Entry preston-werner_semantic_2023 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

---

170-180: Entry martin_clean_2009 looks good.

The bibliographic entry is complete and correctly formatted.

submissions/427/index.qmd (6)

1-30: Metadata section looks good.

The metadata is complete and correctly formatted, with well-specified author details and keywords.

---

32-46: Introduction section looks good.

The introduction is clear, well-structured, and provides a comprehensive overview of the problem and context.

---

48-52: Data as a solid ground section looks good.

The section is informative and provides a solid explanation of the role of XML schema in digital scholarly editions.

---

54-140: Four modern engineering practices section looks good.

The section is well-structured and clearly explains the engineering practices with relevant examples.

---

142-144: A brief outlook section looks good.

The section is concise and effectively summarizes the benefits and future directions of the project.

---

146-149: References section looks good.

The section is correctly formatted for automatic reference generation.