Submission 450, Eliane Schmid #5
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes introduce key files for a Quarto manuscript project exploring the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in historical research. A Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
submissions/450/references.bib (2)
59-72: Consider removing or updating the file field inminsky_are_2021.The local file path may not be necessary for sharing and could be removed or updated to a more accessible location.
- file = {Snapshot:/Users/eliane.schmid/Zotero/storage/XAB8XVSD/are-you-doing-the-swot-analysis-backwards.html:text/html},
86-103: Consider removing or updating the file field inbrewer_basic_2006.The local file path may not be necessary for sharing and could be removed or updated to a more accessible location.
- file = {Full Text:/Users/eliane.schmid/Zotero/storage/H7VFXLGJ/Brewer - 2006 - Basic Mapping Principles for Visualizing Cancer Data Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS).pdf:application/pdf},
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (7)
submissions/450/images/Fig.1.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsubmissions/450/images/Fig.2.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsubmissions/450/images/Fig.3.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsubmissions/450/images/Fig.4.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsubmissions/450/images/Fig.5.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsubmissions/450/images/Fig.6.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsubmissions/450/images/Fig.7.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
Files selected for processing (4)
- submissions/450/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- submissions/450/_quarto.yml (1 hunks)
- submissions/450/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/450/references.bib (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- submissions/450/.gitignore
- submissions/450/_quarto.yml
Additional comments not posted (16)
submissions/450/references.bib (9)
2-12: Entrymonmonier_how_1996looks good.The entry is complete and correctly formatted.
14-25: Entrygregory_historical_2007looks good.The entry is complete and correctly formatted.
27-42: Entrykemp_what_2009looks good.The entry is complete and correctly formatted.
44-57: Entryjones_mapping_2021looks good.The entry is complete and correctly formatted.
74-84: Entryvan_ruymbeke_modeliser_2021looks good.The entry is complete and correctly formatted.
105-112: Entrymassey_for_2005looks good.The entry is complete and correctly formatted.
114-126: Entrywheatley_spatial_2005looks good.The entry is complete and correctly formatted.
128-134: Entryg_envoi_1971looks good.The entry is complete and correctly formatted.
158-164: Entryjones_lesson_2022looks good.The entry is complete and correctly formatted.
submissions/450/index.qmd (7)
1-24: Metadata section looks good.The metadata is comprehensive and correctly formatted.
26-27: Introduction section looks good.The section is well-written and provides a clear overview of the research.
30-32: Strengths section looks good.The section is informative and well-structured, with correct references and figures.
43-47: Weaknesses section looks good.The section provides a balanced view of the limitations of GIS.
50-56: Opportunities section looks good.The section is forward-looking and highlights potential advancements in GIS and AI.
76-83: Threats section looks good.The section raises important ethical considerations and emphasizes the need for critical analysis.
86-88: Conclusion section looks good.The section effectively concludes the document, reinforcing key points discussed throughout the text.
Pull request
Proposed changes
Types of changes
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores
.gitignorefile to improve repository management by excluding unnecessary files from version control.