Submission 444, Bibliography Formatting

[mtwente]

Pull request

Proposed changes

• update .bib file for proper display of author names in bibliography

Types of changes

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
• Enhancement (non-breaking change which enhances functionality)
• Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change).

Checklist

• I have read the README document.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have mentioned all co-authors in the PR description as Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Improved author name formatting in bibliographic entries for better clarity.
  • Updated entries include works by Ahnert, Drobac, Ikkala, and Tamper.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the author field formatting in a .bib file. Specifically, commas separating author names have been replaced with the conjunction "and" to improve clarity. This update affects multiple bibliographic entries, including those for books and articles, while leaving other metadata unchanged.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
submissions/444/references.bib	Updated author formatting by replacing commas with "and" in several entries, including books and articles.

Possibly related PRs

• Submission 431, Kaspar Gubler #19: Submission 431, Kaspar Gubler - This PR includes changes to a .bib file, which may relate to the author formatting changes made in the main PR.
• Submission 443, Ehrmann et al. #62: Submission 443, Ehrmann et al. - Similar to the main PR, this submission also introduces a .bib file with bibliographic entries, potentially relevant to the author formatting changes.
• Submission 480, Citation Info #70: Submission 480, Citation Info - This PR modifies a .bib file, which could be related to the changes in author formatting in the main PR.

Suggested labels

submission

Suggested reviewers

• maehr

Poem

In the land of biblios, where authors unite,
Commas turned to "and," what a lovely sight!
With names all together, clear as can be,
A rabbit hops proudly, for all to see! 🐇✨
In the garden of knowledge, we flourish and grow,
Thanks to the changes that help us all know!

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

submissions/444/references.bib (1)

34-34: LGTM: Author field formatting improved

The change from comma-separated to "and"-separated author names improves readability and adheres to standard BibTeX formatting guidelines. This modification aligns well with the PR objectives to enhance the display of author names in the bibliography.

Consider using 'et al.' notation for in-text citations of this entry, given the large number of authors. However, this is typically handled by the citation style rather than in the .bib file itself.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e8e75be and f09732f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• submissions/444/references.bib (4 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (4)

submissions/444/references.bib (4)

4-4: LGTM: Author field formatting improved

The change from comma-separated to "and"-separated author names improves readability and adheres to standard BibTeX formatting guidelines. This modification aligns well with the PR objectives to enhance the display of author names in the bibliography.

---

63-63: LGTM: Author field formatting improved

The change from comma-separated to "and"-separated author names improves readability and adheres to standard BibTeX formatting guidelines. This modification aligns well with the PR objectives to enhance the display of author names in the bibliography.

---

78-78: LGTM: Author field formatting improved

The change from comma-separated to "and"-separated author names improves readability and adheres to standard BibTeX formatting guidelines. This modification aligns well with the PR objectives to enhance the display of author names in the bibliography.

---

Line range hint 1-114: Overall consistency: Excellent work on bibliography formatting

The changes made to the author fields across all entries in this file are consistent and improve the overall quality of the bibliography. The use of "and" instead of commas to separate author names enhances readability and follows standard BibTeX formatting guidelines. This update successfully addresses the PR objective of ensuring proper display of author names in the bibliography.