You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Over the last year or so I have come across a few examples of JPEG files which have padding after the 0xFFD9 marker. Some are a few bytes while others are megabytes in size. Seems to be a bug in some downloading software.
See https://www.macrumors.com/2020/05/01/macos-jpg-truncation-bug-widespread/
I have noticed some JPEG signatures have 65k of maxbyte offsets, while others have 130k. fmt/44 is looking for 65536 maximum offset x-fmt/390 is looking for 16000 maximum offset x-fmt/391 is looking for 131072 maximum offset
Questions:
Should 0xFFD9 marker be optional for identification?
Over the last year or so I have come across a few examples of JPEG files which have padding after the 0xFFD9 marker. Some are a few bytes while others are megabytes in size. Seems to be a bug in some downloading software.
See https://www.macrumors.com/2020/05/01/macos-jpg-truncation-bug-widespread/
Also a conversation on the subject here:
https://twitter.com/CHLThor/status/1311728118411849728
I have noticed some JPEG signatures have 65k of maxbyte offsets, while others have 130k.
fmt/44 is looking for 65536 maximum offset
x-fmt/390 is looking for 16000 maximum offset
x-fmt/391 is looking for 131072 maximum offset
Questions:
See also Samsung trailer makernotes:
https://exiftool.org/forum/index.php?topic=10813.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: