Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

search_url not defined anywhere? #6

Open
jsmestad opened this issue May 29, 2013 · 3 comments
Open

search_url not defined anywhere? #6

jsmestad opened this issue May 29, 2013 · 3 comments

Comments

@jsmestad
Copy link

Trying to find out where your "find_by_name" example is getting search_url from in the README. Would love some documentation around doing these sorts of one-off find_by methods.

@jsmestad
Copy link
Author

Is this project still in development?

@dlindahl
Copy link
Owner

Yes, it is.

search_url would be a method that you would define yourself.

Presumably, it would take an argument that would then generate the appropriate URL. Something similar to Frenetic's internal member_url method.

Now that I think about it, the README example in question is pretty awful, and for that I apologize (but hey, its an alpha release!). That is why I have left this Issue open so that I can come back around to it and improve the docs.

I've got a few other projects that I have to work on before I can come back around to this, release the new version, and write some better docs.

@jsmestad
Copy link
Author

jsmestad commented Aug 5, 2013

I would love to help improve the project, I think my big questions with frenetic are:

  1. How do you do things like find_by_name finders in the markup?
  2. What is the approach or plan for supporting POST, PUT, DELETE?
  3. How would one model OAuth usage or login usage with the MyAPI.description endpoint?

I think this would give me enough to start contributing to docs and the project as a whole.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants